Go 語言的 graphQL-go 套件正式支援 Concurrent Resolvers

栏目: Go · 发布时间: 7年前

Go 語言的 graphQL-go 套件正式支援 Concurrent Resolvers 要在 Go 語言 寫 graphQL,大家一定對 graphql-go 不陌生,討論度最高的套件,但是我先說,雖然討論度是最高,但是效能是最差的,如果大家很要求效能,可以先參考此 專案 ,裡面有目前 Go 語言的 graphQL 套件比較效能,有機會在寫另外一篇介紹。最近 graphql-go 的作者把 Concurrent Resolvers 的解法寫了一篇 Issue 來討論 ,最終採用了 Resolver returns a Thunk 方式來解決 Concurrent 問題,這個 PR 沒有用到額外的 goroutines,使用方式也最簡單
"pullRequests": &graphql.Field{
    Type: graphql.NewList(PullRequestType),
    Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
        ch := make(chan []PullRequest)
        // Concurrent work via Goroutines.
        go func() {
            // Async work to obtain pullRequests.
            ch <- pullRequests
        }()
        return func() interface{} {
            return <-ch
        }, nil
    },
},

使用方式

先用一個簡單例子來解釋之前的寫法會是什麼形式
package main

import (
    "encoding/json"
    "fmt"
    "log"
    "time"

    "github.com/graphql-go/graphql"
)

type Foo struct {
    Name string
}

var FieldFooType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
    Name: "Foo",
    Fields: graphql.Fields{
        "name": &graphql.Field{Type: graphql.String},
    },
})

type Bar struct {
    Name string
}

var FieldBarType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
    Name: "Bar",
    Fields: graphql.Fields{
        "name": &graphql.Field{Type: graphql.String},
    },
})

// QueryType fields: `concurrentFieldFoo` and `concurrentFieldBar` are resolved
// concurrently because they belong to the same field-level and their `Resolve`
// function returns a function (thunk).
var QueryType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
    Name: "Query",
    Fields: graphql.Fields{
        "concurrentFieldFoo": &graphql.Field{
            Type: FieldFooType,
            Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
                type result struct {
                    data interface{}
                    err  error
                }
                ch := make(chan *result, 1)
                go func() {
                    defer close(ch)
                    time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
                    foo := &Foo{Name: "Foo's name"}
                    ch <- &result{data: foo, err: nil}
                }()
                r := <-ch
                return r.data, r.err
            },
        },
        "concurrentFieldBar": &graphql.Field{
            Type: FieldBarType,
            Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
                type result struct {
                    data interface{}
                    err  error
                }
                ch := make(chan *result, 1)
                go func() {
                    defer close(ch)
                    time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
                    bar := &Bar{Name: "Bar's name"}
                    ch <- &result{data: bar, err: nil}
                }()
                r := <-ch
                return r.data, r.err
            },
        },
    },
})

func main() {
    schema, err := graphql.NewSchema(graphql.SchemaConfig{
        Query: QueryType,
    })
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    query := `
        query {
            concurrentFieldFoo {
                name
            }
            concurrentFieldBar {
                name
            }
        }
    `
    result := graphql.Do(graphql.Params{
        RequestString: query,
        Schema:        schema,
    })
    b, err := json.Marshal(result)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    fmt.Printf("%s", b)
    /*
        {
          "data": {
            "concurrentFieldBar": {
              "name": "Bar's name"
            },
            "concurrentFieldFoo": {
              "name": "Foo's name"
            }
          }
        }
    */
}
接著看看需要多少時間來完成執行
$ time go run examples/concurrent-resolvers/main.go | jq
{
  "data": {
    "concurrentFieldBar": {
      "name": "Bar's name"
    },
    "concurrentFieldFoo": {
      "name": "Foo's name"
    }
  }
}

real    0m4.186s
user    0m0.508s
sys     0m0.925s
總共花費了四秒,原因是每個 resolver 都是依序執行,所以都需要等每個 goroutines 執行完成才能進入到下一個 resolver,上面例子該如何改成 Concurrent 呢,很簡單,只要將 return 的部分換成
return func() (interface{}, error) {
                    r := <-ch
                    return r.data, r.err
                }, nil
執行時間如下
$ time go run examples/concurrent-resolvers/main.go | jq
{
  "data": {
    "concurrentFieldBar": {
      "name": "Bar's name"
    },
    "concurrentFieldFoo": {
      "name": "Foo's name"
    }
  }
}

real    0m1.499s
user    0m0.417s
sys     0m0.242s
從原本的 4 秒多,變成 1.5 秒,原因就是兩個 resolver 的 goroutines 會同時執行,最後才拿結果。

心得

有了這功能後,比較複雜的 graphQL 語法,就可以用此方式加速執行時間。作者也用 Mogodb + graphql 寫了一個 範例 ,大家可以參考看看

以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网

查看所有标签

猜你喜欢:

本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们

Head First HTML and CSS

Head First HTML and CSS

Elisabeth Robson、Eric Freeman / O'Reilly Media / 2012-9-8 / USD 39.99

Tired of reading HTML books that only make sense after you're an expert? Then it's about time you picked up Head First HTML and really learned HTML. You want to learn HTML so you can finally create th......一起来看看 《Head First HTML and CSS》 这本书的介绍吧!

随机密码生成器
随机密码生成器

多种字符组合密码

UNIX 时间戳转换
UNIX 时间戳转换

UNIX 时间戳转换

RGB CMYK 转换工具
RGB CMYK 转换工具

RGB CMYK 互转工具