"pullRequests": &graphql.Field{
Type: graphql.NewList(PullRequestType),
Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
ch := make(chan []PullRequest)
// Concurrent work via Goroutines.
go func() {
// Async work to obtain pullRequests.
ch <- pullRequests
}()
return func() interface{} {
return <-ch
}, nil
},
},
使用方式
先用一個簡單例子來解釋之前的寫法會是什麼形式package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"log"
"time"
"github.com/graphql-go/graphql"
)
type Foo struct {
Name string
}
var FieldFooType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
Name: "Foo",
Fields: graphql.Fields{
"name": &graphql.Field{Type: graphql.String},
},
})
type Bar struct {
Name string
}
var FieldBarType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
Name: "Bar",
Fields: graphql.Fields{
"name": &graphql.Field{Type: graphql.String},
},
})
// QueryType fields: `concurrentFieldFoo` and `concurrentFieldBar` are resolved
// concurrently because they belong to the same field-level and their `Resolve`
// function returns a function (thunk).
var QueryType = graphql.NewObject(graphql.ObjectConfig{
Name: "Query",
Fields: graphql.Fields{
"concurrentFieldFoo": &graphql.Field{
Type: FieldFooType,
Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
type result struct {
data interface{}
err error
}
ch := make(chan *result, 1)
go func() {
defer close(ch)
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
foo := &Foo{Name: "Foo's name"}
ch <- &result{data: foo, err: nil}
}()
r := <-ch
return r.data, r.err
},
},
"concurrentFieldBar": &graphql.Field{
Type: FieldBarType,
Resolve: func(p graphql.ResolveParams) (interface{}, error) {
type result struct {
data interface{}
err error
}
ch := make(chan *result, 1)
go func() {
defer close(ch)
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
bar := &Bar{Name: "Bar's name"}
ch <- &result{data: bar, err: nil}
}()
r := <-ch
return r.data, r.err
},
},
},
})
func main() {
schema, err := graphql.NewSchema(graphql.SchemaConfig{
Query: QueryType,
})
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
query := `
query {
concurrentFieldFoo {
name
}
concurrentFieldBar {
name
}
}
`
result := graphql.Do(graphql.Params{
RequestString: query,
Schema: schema,
})
b, err := json.Marshal(result)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
fmt.Printf("%s", b)
/*
{
"data": {
"concurrentFieldBar": {
"name": "Bar's name"
},
"concurrentFieldFoo": {
"name": "Foo's name"
}
}
}
*/
} 接著看看需要多少時間來完成執行
$ time go run examples/concurrent-resolvers/main.go | jq
{
"data": {
"concurrentFieldBar": {
"name": "Bar's name"
},
"concurrentFieldFoo": {
"name": "Foo's name"
}
}
}
real 0m4.186s
user 0m0.508s
sys 0m0.925s 總共花費了四秒,原因是每個 resolver 都是依序執行,所以都需要等每個 goroutines 執行完成才能進入到下一個 resolver,上面例子該如何改成 Concurrent 呢,很簡單,只要將 return 的部分換成
return func() (interface{}, error) {
r := <-ch
return r.data, r.err
}, nil 執行時間如下
$ time go run examples/concurrent-resolvers/main.go | jq
{
"data": {
"concurrentFieldBar": {
"name": "Bar's name"
},
"concurrentFieldFoo": {
"name": "Foo's name"
}
}
}
real 0m1.499s
user 0m0.417s
sys 0m0.242s 從原本的 4 秒多,變成 1.5 秒,原因就是兩個 resolver 的 goroutines 會同時執行,最後才拿結果。
心得
有了這功能後,比較複雜的 graphQL 語法,就可以用此方式加速執行時間。作者也用 Mogodb + graphql 寫了一個 範例 ,大家可以參考看看以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:- 支援一波 《面试数十人有感》
- gofight 支援檔案上傳測試
- iOS App 如何支援 RTL 語言
- RDS 支援 Storage Auto Scaling
- 開源專案 Gitea 支援 OAuth Provider
- 如何使 VS Code 支援 CSS Intellisense ?
本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
Head First HTML and CSS
Elisabeth Robson、Eric Freeman / O'Reilly Media / 2012-9-8 / USD 39.99
Tired of reading HTML books that only make sense after you're an expert? Then it's about time you picked up Head First HTML and really learned HTML. You want to learn HTML so you can finally create th......一起来看看 《Head First HTML and CSS》 这本书的介绍吧!