内容简介:Elasticsearch的相关度评分(relevance score)算法采用的是term frequency/inverse document frequency算法,简称为TF/IDF算法。例如:搜索请求:hello world
Elasticsearch的相关度评分(relevance score)算法采用的是term frequency/inverse document frequency算法,简称为TF/IDF算法。
算法介绍
relevance score算法,简单来说就是,就是计算出一个索引中的文本,与搜索文本,它们之间的关联匹配程度。
TF/IDF算法,分为两个部分,IF 和IDF
Term Frequency(TF): 搜索文本中的各个词条在field文本中出现了多少次,出现的次数越多,就越相关
例如:
搜索请求:hello world
doc1: hello you, and world is very good
doc2: hello, how are you
那么此时根据TF算法,doc1的相关度要比doc2的要高
Inverse Document Frequency(IDF): 搜索文本中的各个词条在整个索引的所有文档中出现的次数,出现的次数越多,就越不相关。
搜索请求: hello world
doc1: hello, today is very good.
doc2: hi world, how are you.
比如在index中有1万条document, hello这个单词在所有的document中,一共出现了1000次,world这个单词在所有的document中一共出现100次。那么根据IDF算法此时doc2的相关度要比doc1要高。
对于ES还有一个Field-length norm
field-length norm就是field长度越长,相关度就越弱
搜索请求:hello world
doc1: {"title": "hello article", "content": "1万个单词"}
doc2: {"title": "my article", "content": "1万个单词, hi world"}
此时hello world在整个index中出现的次数是一样多的。但是根据Field-length norm此时doc1比doc2相关度要高。因为title字段更短。
_score是如何被计算出来的
GET /test_index/_search?explain=true { "query": { "match": { "test_field": "hello" } } } { "took" : 9, "timed_out" : false, "_shards" : { "total" : 1, "successful" : 1, "skipped" : 0, "failed" : 0 }, "hits" : { "total" : { "value" : 2, "relation" : "eq" }, "max_score" : 0.20521778, "hits" : [ { "_shard" : "[test_index][0]", "_node" : "P-b-TEvyQOylMyEcMEhApQ", "_index" : "test_index", "_type" : "_doc", "_id" : "2", "_score" : 0.20521778, "_source" : { "test_field" : "hello, how are you" }, "_explanation" : { "value" : 0.20521778, "description" : "weight(test_field:hello in 0) [PerFieldSimilarity], result of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 0.20521778, "description" : "score(freq=1.0), product of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2.2, "description" : "boost", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.18232156, "description" : "idf, computed as log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2, "description" : "n, number of documents containing term", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 2, "description" : "N, total number of documents with field", "details" : [ ] } ] }, { "value" : 0.5116279, "description" : "tf, computed as freq / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * dl / avgdl)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 1.0, "description" : "freq, occurrences of term within document", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 1.2, "description" : "k1, term saturation parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.75, "description" : "b, length normalization parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 4.0, "description" : "dl, length of field", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 5.5, "description" : "avgdl, average length of field", "details" : [ ] } ] } ] } ] } }, { "_shard" : "[test_index][0]", "_node" : "P-b-TEvyQOylMyEcMEhApQ", "_index" : "test_index", "_type" : "_doc", "_id" : "1", "_score" : 0.16402164, "_source" : { "test_field" : "hello you, and world is very good" }, "_explanation" : { "value" : 0.16402164, "description" : "weight(test_field:hello in 0) [PerFieldSimilarity], result of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 0.16402164, "description" : "score(freq=1.0), product of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2.2, "description" : "boost", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.18232156, "description" : "idf, computed as log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2, "description" : "n, number of documents containing term", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 2, "description" : "N, total number of documents with field", "details" : [ ] } ] }, { "value" : 0.40892193, "description" : "tf, computed as freq / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * dl / avgdl)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 1.0, "description" : "freq, occurrences of term within document", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 1.2, "description" : "k1, term saturation parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.75, "description" : "b, length normalization parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 7.0, "description" : "dl, length of field", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 5.5, "description" : "avgdl, average length of field", "details" : [ ] } ] } ] } ] } } ] } }
匹配的文档有两个,下面直接用一个文档来分析出ES各个算法的公式。
从上面可以看出第一个文档的相关度分数是0.20521778
{ "_shard" : "[test_index][0]", "_node" : "P-b-TEvyQOylMyEcMEhApQ", "_index" : "test_index", "_type" : "_doc", "_id" : "2", "_score" : 0.20521778, "_source" : { "test_field" : "hello, how are you" }, "_explanation" : { "value" : 0.20521778, "description" : "weight(test_field:hello in 0) [PerFieldSimilarity], result of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 0.20521778, "description" : "score(freq=1.0), product of:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2.2, "description" : "boost", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.18232156, "description" : "idf, computed as log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 2, "description" : "n, number of documents containing term", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 2, "description" : "N, total number of documents with field", "details" : [ ] } ] }, { "value" : 0.5116279, "description" : "tf, computed as freq / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * dl / avgdl)) from:", "details" : [ { "value" : 1.0, "description" : "freq, occurrences of term within document", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 1.2, "description" : "k1, term saturation parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 0.75, "description" : "b, length normalization parameter", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 4.0, "description" : "dl, length of field", "details" : [ ] }, { "value" : 5.5, "description" : "avgdl, average length of field", "details" : [ ] } ] } ] } ] } }
通过观察我们可以知道 _score = boost * idf * tf 此时boost = 2.2, idf = 0.18232156, tf = 0.5116279 idf = log(1 + (N - n + 0.5) / (n + 0.5)) 此时n = 2 (n, number of documents containing term), N = 2(N, total number of documents with field) tf = freq / (freq + k1 * (1 - b + b * dl / avgdl)) 此时freq = 1(freq, occurrences of term within document), k1 = 1.2(k1, term saturation parameter), b = 0.75(b, length normalization parameter), d1 = 4 (dl, length of field), avgdl = 5.5(avgdl, average length of field)
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《elasticsearch学习笔记(三十)——Elasticsearch 相关度评分 TF&IDF算法》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:- ElasticSearch 揭秘lucene的相关度分数算法
- 回归中的相关度和决定系数
- Lucene教程--维护索引、查询对象和相关度排序
- elasticsearch学习笔记高级篇(九)——多shard场景下相关度分数不准确问题
- 通俗易懂--决策树算法、随机森林算法讲解(算法+案例)
- 限流算法之漏桶算法、令牌桶算法
本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。