内容简介:废话不多说,直接上代码看效果最终效果(多次尝试,对比结果都一致):
golang中字符串拼接方法
- +=
- fmt.sprintf
- append
- buffer.WriteString
- copy
废话不多说,直接上代码看效果
package main import ( "bytes" "fmt" "time" ) func main() { str:="chinese" city:="beijing" // 1. += s:=time.Now() for i:=0;i<100000;i++ { str +=city } e:=time.Since(s) fmt.Println("time cost 1:", e) // 2. fmt.Sprintf str="chinese" city="beijing" s=time.Now() for i:=0;i<100000;i++ { str = fmt.Sprintf("%s%s",str,city) } e=time.Since(s) fmt.Println("time cost 2:", e) //3. buffer.WriteString str="chinese" city="beijing" s=time.Now() var buf= bytes.Buffer{} buf.WriteString(str) for i:=0;i<100000;i++ { buf.WriteString(city) } e=time.Since(s) fmt.Println("time cost 3:", e) //4. append str="chinese" city="beijing" s=time.Now() bstr:=[]byte(str) bcity:=[]byte(city) for i:=0;i<100000;i++ { bstr= append(bstr, bcity...) } e=time.Since(s) fmt.Println("time cost 4:", e) // 5. copy str="chinese" city="beijing" s=time.Now() zstr :=[]byte(str) for i:=0;i<100000;i++ { copy(zstr, city) } e=time.Since(s) fmt.Println("time cost 5:", e) }
最终效果(多次尝试,对比结果都一致):
time cost 1: 3.176250251s time cost 2: 5.347827717s time cost 3: 1.051104ms time cost 4: 769.258µs time cost 5: 323.968µs
效率:copy > append > buf.WriteString > += > fmt.Sprintf
所以请慎用fmt.Sprinf 和 +=
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《golang各种字符串拼接性能对比》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
Smarter Than You Think
Clive Thompson / Penguin Press HC, The / 2013-9-12 / USD 27.95
It's undeniable—technology is changing the way we think. But is it for the better? Amid a chorus of doomsayers, Clive Thompson delivers a resounding "yes." The Internet age has produced a radical new ......一起来看看 《Smarter Than You Think》 这本书的介绍吧!
RGB转16进制工具
RGB HEX 互转工具
RGB HSV 转换
RGB HSV 互转工具