内容简介:之前做一道面试题:startService 和 bindService 有什么不同?为什么 bindService 能和 Activity 的生命周期联动?前一个问题可以很快回答出来:生命周期不同,结束方式不同,交互方式不同。后一个问题也能很快想到应该是 Activity 在销毁的时候顺带把 Service 销毁了。那么为什么 startService 不行呢?具体是怎么实现的呢?如果不对源码研究一番,似乎无法给出让人信服的回答,于是就有了这篇文章。
之前做一道面试题:startService 和 bindService 有什么不同?为什么 bindService 能和 Activity 的生命周期联动?
前一个问题可以很快回答出来:生命周期不同,结束方式不同,交互方式不同。
后一个问题也能很快想到应该是 Activity 在销毁的时候顺带把 Service 销毁了。那么为什么 startService 不行呢?具体是怎么实现的呢?如果不对源码研究一番,似乎无法给出让人信服的回答,于是就有了这篇文章。
启动和绑定的区别
无论是启动 Activity,还是 Service,基本的流程都是 Context -> ActivtityManagerService -> 某些中间类(Activity 是 ActivityStarter、ActivityStack 等,Service 是 ActiveServices) -> ActivityThread。具体的代码流程比较长,而且很多和本文要探讨的主题无关,因此这里不会详细分析启动或绑定的流程,而只会保留与本文相关的部分源码。
startService
从 ContextImpl 的 startService 方法开始说起:
class ContextImpl extends Context { @Override public ComponentName startService(Intent service) { warnIfCallingFromSystemProcess(); return startServiceCommon(service, false, mUser); } private ComponentName startServiceCommon(Intent service, boolean requireForeground, UserHandle user) { try { // 检查 Intent validateServiceIntent(service); service.prepareToLeaveProcess(this); // 启动 Service ComponentName cn = ActivityManager.getService().startService( mMainThread.getApplicationThread(), service, service.resolveTypeIfNeeded( getContentResolver()), requireForeground, getOpPackageName(), user.getIdentifier()); // 检查结果 if (cn != null) { ... } return cn; } catch (RemoteException e) { throw e.rethrowFromSystemServer(); } } } 复制代码
ActivityManager.getService() 返回的就是 AMS 本身,而 AMS 只起到一个中转的作用,除了一些参数判断之外,AMS 直接调用了 ActiveServices 的 startServiceLocked:
public final class ActiveServices { final ActivityManagerService mAm; ComponentName startServiceLocked(IApplicationThread caller, Intent service, String resolvedType, int callingPid, int callingUid, boolean fgRequired, String callingPackage, final int userId) throws TransactionTooLargeException { // 和 Activity 同样有一个 Record 记录对应的组件 ServiceRecord r = res.record; ... // 主要是检查,发现错误则抛出异常,或返回 null 等结果 // 设置 ServiceRecord 的数据域 r.lastActivity = SystemClock.uptimeMillis(); r.startRequested = true; r.delayedStop = false; r.fgRequired = fgRequired; r.pendingStarts.add(new ServiceRecord.StartItem(r, false, r.makeNextStartId(), service, neededGrants, callingUid)); ... // 主要是检查,发现错误则抛出异常,或返回 null 等结果 // 启动 ComponentName cmp = startServiceInnerLocked(smap, service, r, callerFg, addToStarting); return cmp; } } 复制代码
好了,startService 的流程暂时分析到这里,后面也没什么特别的,最后还是会由 ActivityThread 来创建 Service 对象,回调相关的生命周期方法等。
bindService
下面看 bindService 的实现:
class ContextImpl extends Context { final @NonNull LoadedApk mPackageInfo; private final @Nullable IBinder mActivityToken; @Override public boolean bindService(Intent service, ServiceConnection conn, int flags) { warnIfCallingFromSystemProcess(); return bindServiceCommon(service, conn, flags, mMainThread.getHandler(), Process.myUserHandle()); } private boolean bindServiceCommon(Intent service, ServiceConnection conn, int flags, Handler handler, UserHandle user) { ... IServiceConnection sd; if (mPackageInfo != null) { sd = mPackageInfo.getServiceDispatcher(conn, getOuterContext(), handler, flags); } else { throw new RuntimeException("Not supported in system context"); } try { // 这个 token 是 Activity 启动时创建的,对应于 Activity 的 mToken 成员 IBinder token = getActivityToken(); ... int res = ActivityManager.getService().bindService( mMainThread.getApplicationThread(), getActivityToken(), service, service.resolveTypeIfNeeded(getContentResolver()), sd, flags, getOpPackageName(), user.getIdentifier()); ... } catch (RemoteException e) { ... } } @Override public IBinder getActivityToken() { return mActivityToken; } } 复制代码
可以看到,相比 startService,bindService 还在 ContextImpl 执行的时候就已经显示出了它的不同,除了会获取 Activity 的 token 之外,还有一个很关键的调用是 LoadedApk 的 getServiceDispatcher 方法:
public final class LoadedApk { private final ArrayMap<Context, ArrayMap<ServiceConnection, LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher>> mServices = new ArrayMap<>(); public final IServiceConnection getServiceDispatcher(ServiceConnection c, Context context, Handler handler, int flags) { synchronized (mServices) { LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher sd = null; ArrayMap<ServiceConnection, LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher> map = mServices.get(context); if (map != null) { sd = map.get(c); } if (sd == null) { sd = new ServiceDispatcher(c, context, handler, flags); if (map == null) { map = new ArrayMap<>(); mServices.put(context, map); // 记录 } map.put(c, sd); // 记录 ServiceConnection } else { sd.validate(context, handler); } return sd.getIServiceConnection(); } } } 复制代码
ServiceDispatcher 可以忽略,主要关注 mServices 这个成员,它记录了即将绑定到 Activity 的 ServiceConnection。
接着看后面的绑定流程,AMS 同样跳过,直接看 ActiveServices 的实现:
public final class ActiveServices { final ActivityManagerService mAm; final ArrayMap<IBinder, ArrayList<ConnectionRecord>> mServiceConnections = new ArrayMap<>(); int bindServiceLocked(IApplicationThread caller, IBinder token, Intent service, String resolvedType, final IServiceConnection connection, int flags, String callingPackage, final int userId) throws TransactionTooLargeException { // 获取应用进程的信息 final ProcessRecord callerApp = mAm.getRecordForAppLocked(caller); if (callerApp == null) { throw new SecurityException( "Unable to find app for caller " + caller + " (pid=" + Binder.getCallingPid() + ") when binding service " + service); } // 获取绑定的 Activity 信息 ActivityRecord activity = null; if (token != null) { activity = ActivityRecord.isInStackLocked(token); if (activity == null) { Slog.w(TAG, "Binding with unknown activity: " + token); return 0; } } // 获取 ServiceRecord ServiceRecord s = res.record; boolean permissionsReviewRequired = false; // 启动 Activity,成功启动后再启动 Service if (mAm.mPermissionReviewRequired) { if (mAm.getPackageManagerInternalLocked().isPermissionsReviewRequired( s.packageName, s.userId)) { RemoteCallback callback = new RemoteCallback( new RemoteCallback.OnResultListener() { @Override public void onResult(Bundle result) { synchronized(mAm) { final long identity = Binder.clearCallingIdentity(); try { ... if (...) { try { // 启动 Service bringUpServiceLocked(...); } catch (RemoteException e) { /* ignore - local call */ } } else { ... } } finally { ... } } } }); final Intent intent = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_REVIEW_PERMISSIONS); // 注意 callback intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_REMOTE_CALLBACK, callback); // 启动 Activity,成功启动后回调 callback mAm.mHandler.post(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { mAm.mContext.startActivityAsUser(intent, new UserHandle(userId)); } }); } } final long origId = Binder.clearCallingIdentity(); try { ... // 注意参数 activity(ActivityRecord) ConnectionRecord c = new ConnectionRecord(b, activity, connection, flags, clientLabel, clientIntent); // connection 参数为 IServiceConnection IBinder binder = connection.asBinder(); // 让 ActivityRecord 记录 connections 信息 if (activity != null) { if (activity.connections == null) { activity.connections = new HashSet<ConnectionRecord>(); } activity.connections.add(c); } // 让 ServiceRecord 记录 connections 信息 ArrayList<ConnectionRecord> clist = s.connections.get(binder); if (clist == null) { clist = new ArrayList<ConnectionRecord>(); s.connections.put(binder, clist); } clist.add(c); // 让自身的成员变量 mServiceConnections 记录 connections 信息 clist = mServiceConnections.get(binder); if (clist == null) { clist = new ArrayList<ConnectionRecord>(); mServiceConnections.put(binder, clist); } clist.add(c); ... if ((flags&Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE) != 0) { // 如果设置了绑定后自动启动 s.lastActivity = SystemClock.uptimeMillis(); // 启动 Service if (bringUpServiceLocked(s, service.getFlags(), callerFg, false, permissionsReviewRequired) != null) { return 0; } } if (s.app != null && b.intent.received) { // Service 已经在运行中,直接回调 onServiceConnected 即可 // Service is already running, so we can immediately // publish the connection. try { // 回调 onServiceConnected c.conn.connected(s.name, b.intent.binder, false); } catch (Exception e) { ... } ... } else if (!b.intent.requested) { // 绑定 onBind,内部调用了 scheduleBindService requestServiceBindingLocked(s, b.intent, callerFg, false); } } finally { Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(origId); } return 1; } } 复制代码
可以看到,相比 startService,bindService 在启动 Service 之前做了一些额外的工作:
- 通知 LoadedApk 记录 ServiceConnection
- 根据 ActivityToken 获取 ActivityRecord
- 添加 ConnectionRecord 到 ActivityRecord 及 ServiceRecord 上
上面就是 startService 和 bindService 在源码实现上的主要区别了,下面开始分析 Activity 的 finish 方法,看看 Service 是怎么随着 Activity 的销毁而销毁的。
Service 是怎么随着 Activity 的销毁而销毁的?
和启动流程类似,finish 的执行流程为 Activity -> ActivityManager -> ActivitiyStack -> ActivityThread,因为代码量有些大,而且前三步和本文关系不大,因此这里直接看 ActivityThread 的实现即可:
public final class ActivityThread { final ArrayMap<IBinder, ActivityClientRecord> mActivities = new ArrayMap<>(); private void handleDestroyActivity(IBinder token, boolean finishing, int configChanges, boolean getNonConfigInstance) { // 回调生命周期方法 ActivityClientRecord r = performDestroyActivity(token, finishing, configChanges, getNonConfigInstance); if (r != null) { // 清理 window 资源 cleanUpPendingRemoveWindows(r, finishing); // 删除 DecorView WindowManager wm = r.activity.getWindowManager(); View v = r.activity.mDecor; if (v != null) { IBinder wtoken = v.getWindowToken(); if (r.activity.mWindowAdded) { if (r.mPreserveWindow) { r.window.clearContentView(); } else { wm.removeViewImmediate(v); } } // 清除记录,这个记录可以参考 ViewRootImpl 的 setView 方法 if (wtoken != null && r.mPendingRemoveWindow == null) { WindowManagerGlobal.getInstance().closeAll(wtoken, r.activity.getClass().getName(), "Activity"); } else if (r.mPendingRemoveWindow != null) { WindowManagerGlobal.getInstance().closeAllExceptView(token, v, r.activity.getClass().getName(), "Activity"); } r.activity.mDecor = null; } if (r.mPendingRemoveWindow == null) { WindowManagerGlobal.getInstance().closeAll(token, r.activity.getClass().getName(), "Activity"); } // 使用 Base Context 执行最后的清理步骤 Context c = r.activity.getBaseContext(); if (c instanceof android.app.ContextImpl) { ((ContextImpl) c).scheduleFinalCleanup( r.activity.getClass().getName(), "Activity"); } } // 通知 AMS if (finishing) { try { ActivityManager.getService().activityDestroyed(token); } catch (RemoteException ex) { throw ex.rethrowFromSystemServer(); } } mSomeActivitiesChanged = true; } } 复制代码
可以看到,在 ActivityThread 中,Activity 的销毁流程共有 4 步:
- 回调 onPause、onStop、onDestroy 等生命周期方法
- 关闭 Window、移除 DecorView、清理 WindowManager 的记录
- 调用 ContextImpl 执行最后的清理步骤
- 通知 AMS Activity 已被销毁
Service 的解绑逻辑就隐藏在 ContextImpl 里面,下面看它的实现:
class ContextImpl extends Context { final @NonNull ActivityThread mMainThread; final @NonNull LoadedApk mPackageInfo; // 回调 ActivityThread final void scheduleFinalCleanup(String who, String what) { mMainThread.scheduleContextCleanup(this, who, what); } // ActivityThread 最终又回调了该方法 final void performFinalCleanup(String who, String what) { //Log.i(TAG, "Cleanup up context: " + this); mPackageInfo.removeContextRegistrations(getOuterContext(), who, what); } } 复制代码
可以看到,ContextImpl 只是起到了一个中转的作用,最终是交给 LoadedApk 执行的。从方法 removeContextRegistrations 的名字可以推测出,它的作用是清理注册到 Context 上的资源:
public final class LoadedApk { private final ArrayMap<Context, ArrayMap<BroadcastReceiver, ReceiverDispatcher>> mReceivers = new ArrayMap<>(); private final ArrayMap<Context, ArrayMap<BroadcastReceiver, LoadedApk.ReceiverDispatcher>> mUnregisteredReceivers = new ArrayMap<>(); private final ArrayMap<Context, ArrayMap<ServiceConnection, LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher>> mServices = new ArrayMap<>(); private final ArrayMap<Context, ArrayMap<ServiceConnection, LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher>> mUnboundServices = new ArrayMap<>(); public void removeContextRegistrations(Context context, String who, String what) { final boolean reportRegistrationLeaks = StrictMode.vmRegistrationLeaksEnabled(); synchronized (mReceivers) { // 获取注册到 Context 上的 BroadcastReceiver ArrayMap<BroadcastReceiver, LoadedApk.ReceiverDispatcher> rmap = mReceivers.remove(context); if (rmap != null) { // 遍历,逐个注销 for (int i = 0; i < rmap.size(); i++) { LoadedApk.ReceiverDispatcher rd = rmap.valueAt(i); // 打印异常信息 IntentReceiverLeaked leak = new IntentReceiverLeaked( what + " " + who + " has leaked IntentReceiver " + rd.getIntentReceiver() + " that was " + "originally registered here. Are you missing a " + "call to unregisterReceiver()?"); leak.setStackTrace(rd.getLocation().getStackTrace()); Slog.e(android.app.ActivityThread.TAG, leak.getMessage(), leak); if (reportRegistrationLeaks) { StrictMode.onIntentReceiverLeaked(leak); } // 通知 AMS 注销 BroadcastReceiver try { ActivityManager.getService().unregisterReceiver( rd.getIIntentReceiver()); } catch (RemoteException e) { throw e.rethrowFromSystemServer(); } } } mUnregisteredReceivers.remove(context); } synchronized (mServices) { // 获取绑定到 Context 上的 ServiceConnection ArrayMap<ServiceConnection, LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher> smap = mServices.remove(context); if (smap != null) { // 遍历,逐个解绑 for (int i = 0; i < smap.size(); i++) { LoadedApk.ServiceDispatcher sd = smap.valueAt(i); // 打印异常信息 ServiceConnectionLeaked leak = new ServiceConnectionLeaked( what + " " + who + " has leaked ServiceConnection " + sd.getServiceConnection() + " that was originally bound here"); leak.setStackTrace(sd.getLocation().getStackTrace()); Slog.e(android.app.ActivityThread.TAG, leak.getMessage(), leak); if (reportRegistrationLeaks) { StrictMode.onServiceConnectionLeaked(leak); } // 通知 AMS 解绑 ServiceConnection try { // 具体实现参考 ActivityManager.getService().unbindService( sd.getIServiceConnection()); } catch (RemoteException e) { throw e.rethrowFromSystemServer(); } sd.doForget(); } } mUnboundServices.remove(context); } } } 复制代码
果然,removeContextRegistrations 的作用就是把注册/绑定到 Context 上的 BroadcastReceiver、ServiceConnection 给注销/解绑,并抛出异常信息,告诉用户应该主动地注销/解绑。unbindService、unregisterReceiver 的流程忽略,无非还是从相关的列表中删除一些记录(比如 activity.connections),并通知 ActivityThread 执行最后的注销逻辑。
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。