Real World CTF 2018 rwext5命题报告

栏目: 后端 · 发布时间: 5年前

内容简介:史上最强国际顶尖战队集结5大洲、15个国家地区、20支战队。近5年共计获得150次CTF全球冠军。100名最强CTF选手,48小时不间断赛制。12月1-2日,中国郑州、长亭科技,首届Real World国际CTF网络安全大赛,线下总决赛,大幕开启!我也好想去郑州啊:sob:In November, I created a forensics/reversing challenge “rwext5” for Real World CTF 2018 Finals.

史上最强国际顶尖战队集结5大洲、15个国家地区、20支战队。近5年共计获得150次CTF全球冠军。100名最强CTF选手,48小时不间断赛制。12月1-2日,中国郑州、长亭科技,首届Real World国际CTF网络安全大赛,线下总决赛,大幕开启!

我也好想去郑州啊:sob:

In November, I created a forensics/reversing challenge “rwext5” for Real World CTF 2018 Finals.

kelwya找我来出题,他说可以forensics。因为很久没有做题,在ccls-fringe出完后感觉又陷入了出题困难的尴尬状态QAQ。因为我对文件系统有一点兴趣,就盘算着是否找个成熟的fs,稍微修补下使得和正常行为不同,然后制作一个磁盘格式化为该fs,塞入藏匿的flag和其他辅助解密的线索。

It is about the hypothetical filesystem “ext5”, which is obviously based on ext4. Actually, I patched lwext4 a bit to make it different from a standard ext4 filesystem. Contestants were supposed to reverse engineer rwext5-mkfs and rwext5-import and find the nuance.

% tar tf rwext5.tar.xz 
rwext5-import
rwext5-mkfs
rwext5.img

After successful deobfuscation, the following files can be found in rwext5.img :

% tree -a
.
├── 0001-Raise-cmake_minimum_required-2.8-3.4.patch
├── 0002-Fix-const-const-warning.patch
├── 0003-Don-t-copy-include.patch
├── 0004-Fix-ext4_mkfs_info-feat_-ro_compat-compat-incompat.patch
├── 0005-Fix-jbd_commit_header-chksum_-type-size.patch
├── bin
│   ├── clang
│   ├── ld.lld
│   └── llvm-objcopy
├── .config
│   ├── Code
│   │   └── User
│   │       └── settings.json
│   ├── doom
│   │   ├── init.el
│   │   └── modules
│   │       └── private
│   │           └── my-cc
│   │               ├── autoload.el
│   │               ├── flag.0.o
│   │               ├── flag.1.o
│   │               ├── config.el
│   │               └── packages.el
│   └── nvim
│       └── init.vim
├── lwext4
│   ├── .ccls-cache
│   │   └── .keep
│   └── compile_commands.json
└── README

flag、hint and other files

The image includes some form of the flag file, a copy of lwext4 (as a hint that the two distributed tools rwext5-mkfs rwext5-import should be reversed and compared with standard ones). It would be interesting to put some other stuff (also served as market promotion purpose for my project and the LSP ecosystem :)

镜像里除了 flag 文件和一整套lwext4源码 lwext4 (提示需要改什么),还得有点其他东西起到迷惑作用,因此我塞了下面这些东西:

另外也想给自己的项目打广告,萌生了从 ccls 的cache弄一道forensics的想法,因为惰性拖了两个星期没有动手。之前一次LeetCode Weekly前在和一个学弟聊天,就想把他的id嵌入了flag。LeetCode第一题Leaf-Similar Trees没有叫成same-fringe,所以我的题目就带上fringe字样“科普”一下吧。

  • lwext4/.ccls-cache : .ccls-cache is the default cache directory of ccls.
  • 5 .patch files have been uploaded (and merged) after the contest https://github.com/gkostka/lwext4/pull/43 ~47
  • .config/nvim/init.vim : language clients of Vim/NeoVim:ale, coc.nvim, LanguageClient-neovim, vim-lsp。
  • .config/Code/User/settings.json : VSCode configuration of ccls

Create a file flag of 1111 blocks (512 bytes per block) filled with random bytes and place the plaintext flag in the 555th block. Encrypt it with openssl enc -aes-128-cbc -pass pass:filesystem -in flag.plain -out flag .

至于 bin/{clang,lld,llvm-objcopy} ,因为我对这些 工具 分别有50+,90+,10+ commits(努力学习:books:),而且觉得用他们继续藏匿:checkered_flag:挺好玩就加进去啦。

% cat clang
I am not used in the challenge, but I empowers language servers.
% cat ld.lld
I can concatenate sections.
% cat llvm-objcopy
I can dump sections.
$(flag0): flag
	head -c 1000000 flag > $@
	llvm-objcopy -I binary -B powerpc:common64 $@
	llvm-objcopy --rename-section=.data=.openssl_aes-128-cbc_pass:filesystem $@
	echo empty > empty; llvm-objcopy --add-section=.turkey_for_thanksgiving=empty $@; rm empty

$(flag1): flag
	tail -c +1000001 flag > $@
	llvm-objcopy -I binary -B powerpc:common64 $@
	llvm-objcopy --rename-section=.data=.openssl_aes-128-cbc_pass:filesystem $@
	echo empty > empty; llvm-objcopy --add-section=.gift_for_christmas=empty $@; rm empty

flag encrypted by openssl was split by llvm-objcopy into two halves: flag.0.o and flag.1.o .

openssl加密后的 flag 拆成两部分用llvm-objcopy简单处理得到 flag.0.oflag.1.o 。这两个文件放在 .config/doom/modules/private/my-cc/ ( .config/doom/ 是放置Doom Emacs个人定制的目录)。

lwext4 obfuscation

I modified ext4_ext_find_goal (lwext4 uses a first-fit algorithm to find the first free block) so that it would return a random block, otherwise the extent block tended to be continuous and the contestants wouldn’t need to decrypt the metadata to recover the two object files.

diff --git a/src/ext4_extent.c b/src/ext4_extent.c
index abac59b..791f8a7 100644
--- a/src/ext4_extent.c
+++ b/src/ext4_extent.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <inttypes.h>
 #include <stddef.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
 
 #if CONFIG_EXTENTS_ENABLE
 /*
@@ -593,6 +594,15 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_ext_find_goal(struct ext4_inode_ref *inode_ref,
 				       struct ext4_extent_path *path,
 				       ext4_lblk_t block)
 {
+ // CTF
+ static int z;
+ if (!z) {
+ struct timeval t;
+ gettimeofday(&t, NULL);
+ srand(t.tv_sec ^ t.tv_usec / 1000);
+ z = 1;
+ }
+ return rand() % ext4_sb_get_blocks_cnt(&inode_ref->fs->sb);
 	if (path) {
 		uint32_t depth = path->depth;
 		struct ext4_extent *ex;

The struct members of superblock inode are reordered a bit:

diff --git a/include/ext4_types.h b/include/ext4_types.h
index c9cdd34..a4c5050 100644
--- a/include/ext4_types.h
+++ b/include/ext4_types.h
@@ -78,9 +78,10 @@ struct ext4_sblock {
 	uint32_t first_data_block;	 /* First Data Block */
 	uint32_t log_block_size;	   /* Block size */
 	uint32_t log_cluster_size;	 /* Obsoleted fragment size */
- uint32_t blocks_per_group; /* Number of blocks per group */
- uint32_t frags_per_group; /* Obsoleted fragments per group */
+ // CTF swap
 	uint32_t inodes_per_group;	 /* Number of inodes per group */
+ uint32_t frags_per_group; /* Obsoleted fragments per group */
+ uint32_t blocks_per_group; /* Number of blocks per group */
 	uint32_t mount_time;		   /* Mount time */
 	uint32_t write_time;		   /* Write time */
 	uint16_t mount_count;		   /* Mount count */
@@ -245,6 +246,8 @@ struct ext4_sblock {
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_MMP 0x0100
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_FLEX_BG 0x0200
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_EA_INODE 0x0400	 /* EA in inode */
+// CTF
+#define EXT4_FINCOM_CTF 0x800
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_DIRDATA 0x1000	  /* data in dirent */
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_BG_USE_META_CSUM 0x2000 /* use crc32c for bg */
 #define EXT4_FINCOM_LARGEDIR 0x4000	 /* >2GB or 3-lvl htree */
@@ -281,7 +284,7 @@ struct ext4_sblock {
 #define EXT4_SUPPORTED_FINCOM                              \
 	(EXT4_FINCOM_FILETYPE | EXT4_FINCOM_META_BG |      \
 	 EXT4_FINCOM_EXTENTS | EXT4_FINCOM_FLEX_BG |       \
- EXT4_FINCOM_64BIT)
+ EXT4_FINCOM_64BIT | EXT4_FINCOM_CTF)
 
 #define EXT4_SUPPORTED_FRO_COM                             \
 	(EXT4_FRO_COM_SPARSE_SUPER |                       \
@@ -371,13 +374,14 @@ struct ext4_bgroup {
  * Structure of an inode on the disk
  */
 struct ext4_inode {
- uint16_t mode; /* File mode */
 	uint16_t uid;		    /* Low 16 bits of owner uid */
- uint32_t size_lo; /* Size in bytes */
+ uint16_t mode; /* File mode */
+ // CTF
 	uint32_t access_time;       /* Access time */
 	uint32_t change_inode_time; /* I-node change time */
 	uint32_t modification_time; /* Modification time */
 	uint32_t deletion_time;     /* Deletion time */
+ uint32_t size_lo; /* Size in bytes */
 	uint16_t gid;		    /* Low 16 bits of group id */
 	uint16_t links_count;       /* Links count */
 	uint32_t blocks_count_lo;   /* Blocks count */
diff --git a/src/ext4_extent.c b/src/ext4_extent.c
index 791f8a7..375a2f6 100644
--- a/src/ext4_extent.c
+++ b/src/ext4_extent.c
@@ -92,10 +92,11 @@ struct ext4_extent_tail
  * It's used at the bottom of the tree.
  */
 struct ext4_extent {
- uint32_t first_block; /* First logical block extent covers */
- uint16_t block_count; /* Number of blocks covered by extent */
- uint16_t start_hi; /* High 16 bits of physical block */
- uint32_t start_lo; /* Low 32 bits of physical block */
+ // CTF
+ uint16_t block_count; /* Number of blocks covered by extent */
+ uint16_t start_hi; /* High 16 bits of physical block */
+ uint32_t start_lo; /* Low 32 bits of physical block */
+ uint32_t first_block; /* First logical block extent covers */
 };
 
 /*

Two tools compiled from the obfuscated lwext4 are provided:

rwext5-mkfs
rwext5-import

Fill rwext5.img with dd if=/dev/urandom , run rwext5-mkfs , and then populate it with flag.0.o , flag.1.o , lwext4 and other files. The final rwext5.img was distributed among teams.

By reversing the two programs contestants can figure out how struct members are reordered. They may write an export tool (I wrote a rwext5-export ) to copy the two object files out or assemble extent blocks by hand. Both object files have the section with a weird name “.openssl_aes-128-cbc_pass:filesystem”. A linker concatenates the section contents and llvm-objcopy may be used to dump the section. It is straightforward to decrypt the contents with openssl and get the plaintext flag:

The flag is rwctf{ext4 adds extent tree to ext3}

逆向以上两个程序即可发现fields打乱的方式。可以自行编写导出工具(我写了一个 rwext5-export )或者手工查找组成 flag.0.o flag.1.o 的extents,恢复出来后用lld拼接,用llvm-objcopy dump被openssl加密的section,按照section名提示的密钥解密后读出明文flag。

test: bin/rwext5-cat $(image) flag.plain
        mkdir -p test                                
        bin/rwext5-cat $(image) ctf/README                                         
        bin/rwext5-cat $(image) ctf/.config/doom/modules/private/my-cc/flag.0.o > test/flag.0.o
        bin/rwext5-cat $(image) ctf/.config/doom/modules/private/my-cc/flag.1.o > test/flag.1.o
        ld.lld test/flag.0.o test/flag.1.o -o /dev/stdout | llvm-objcopy --dump-section=.openssl_aes-128-cbc_pass:filesystem=/tmp/flag - /dev/null
        openssl enc -d -aes-128-cbc -pass pass:filesystem -in /tmp/flag | cmp - flag.plain

Code

https://github.com/MaskRay/RealWorldCTF-2018-ccls-fringe-and-rwext5

Thanks to gkostka for the lwext4 project (I should really learn more about ext4), and ngkaho1234 for the help to modify lwext4!


以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Real World CTF 2018 rwext5命题报告》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!

查看所有标签

猜你喜欢:

本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们

人件(原书第3版)

人件(原书第3版)

[美] Tom DeMarco、[美] Timothy Lister / 肖然、张逸、滕云 / 机械工业出版社 / 2014-8 / 69.00元

在软件管理领域,很少有著作能够与本书媲美。作为经久不衰的畅销书,本书深刻地洞察到软件开发的最大问题不在于技术,而在于人。人的因素并不容易解决,一旦解决了,你将更有可能获得成功。 本书是软件管理领域的传奇经典,被誉为“对美国软件业影响最大的一本书”。全书从管理人力资源、创建健康的办公环境、雇用并留用正确的人、高效团队形成、改造企业文化和快乐工作等多个角度阐释了如何思考和管理软件开发的最大问题—......一起来看看 《人件(原书第3版)》 这本书的介绍吧!

图片转BASE64编码
图片转BASE64编码

在线图片转Base64编码工具

XML、JSON 在线转换
XML、JSON 在线转换

在线XML、JSON转换工具

HEX CMYK 转换工具
HEX CMYK 转换工具

HEX CMYK 互转工具