内容简介:E.g.There are a few drawbacks with HOC.
React Hooks — The Ins and Outs
Jun 27 ·4min read
Hooks are functions that let you “hook into” React state and lifecycle features from function components.
Why hooks
How did we reuse stateful logic — HOC
E.g.
import { withRouter } from "react-router-dom"; import { Form } from 'antd';function A(props) { const { match: { params }, history, form } = props; return <div> test </div>; }export default withRouter(Form.create()(A))
There are a few drawbacks with HOC.
- wrapper hell of components. HOC actually returns a new component that wraps the original component.
- unclear dependencies: from the view of Component A , we have no way to clearly know this.props.form is from Form.create HOC, and this.props.history is from withRouter HOC
- naming conflicts: imagine that Form.create and withRouter both inject a prop with the same name, which can easily happen as they are two separate HOCs that are properly maintained by two teams
How can we improve with Hooks
import { useHistory } from "react-router-dom"; import { Form } from 'antd';export default function A(props) { const [form] = Form.useForm(); const history = useHistory(); return <div> test </div>; }
- no wrapper any more as they are all at the same level
- clear dependencies as they are from separate hooks call: form from useForm and history from useHistory
- no naming conflicts as they are from separate hooks and you can rename hooks return values
Hooks in practice
To implement a controlled Input element with reset functionality, we can do it this way :
import React, { useState } from "react"; import { Input, Button } from 'antd';export default function App() { const initialValue = 'please enter something'; const [inputValue, setInputValue] = useState(initialValue); return ( <div className="App"> // note the value is from e.target <Input value={inputValue} onChange={e => setInputValue(e.target.value)}/> <Button onClick={() => setInputValue(initialValue)}> Reset </Button> </div> ); }
There are a couple of stateful logic that we can abstract and resue.
- value fetch — e.target.value
- reset logic — reset to initial value
custom hook — useEventTarget
import { useState, useCallback } from "react";export default function useEventTarget(initialValue = "") { const [value, setValue] = useState(initialValue); const onChange = useCallback(e => setValue(e.target.value), []); // reusable value fetch logic const reset = useCallback(() => setValue(initialValue), [initialValue]); // resuable reset logic return { value, onChange, reset }; }
The above example can then be refactored with custom useEventTarget hook:
import React from "react"; import { Input, Button } from "antd"; import useEventTarget from "./useEventTarget";export default function App() { const { value, onChange, reset } = useEventTarget("please enter something"); return ( <div className="App"> <Input value={value} onChange={onChange} /> <Button onClick={reset}> Reset </Button> </div> ); }
Mental overhead
Hooks is NOT a substitute for class lifecycles though useEffect can simulate what lifecycles do. Hooks facilitates reusing stateful logic but it comes with costs.
Assume that I need a page that display count which is from zero and increment by one per second.
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';export default function SetInterval() { const [ count, setCount ] = useState(0); useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(() => { console.log("interval count", count); // count is always 0 setCount(count + 1); }, 1000); return () => { clearInterval(interval) } }, []); return <div> normal count is { count } </div>; }
With the code above , the count on the page will stay on 1. This is due to the fact that useEffect call only runs on mount (as useEffect dependency is set to [] on line 14) and the count value at that point is 0 (i.e the initial value we set with useState call on line 4). Each time the interval function is called, the count value will always be 0 as it’s a closure variable. Therefore, setCount(count + 1) will be setCount(1).
Solution 1 — useEffect dependencies
Specify the dependencies if your useEffect depends on outer variables
import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";export default function SetInterval() { const [count, setCount] = useState(0); useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(() => { console.log('interval count', count); // increment by one per run setCount(count + 1); }, 1000); return () => { // each time count value changes (i.e per second, clear the interval and init one with new count value console.log('interval clear', count); clearInterval(interval); } }, [count]); return <div> dep count is {count} </div>; }
Solution 2 — use state callback
import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";export default function SetInterval() { const [count, setCount] = useState(0); useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(() => { // it doesnt matter what count was, it tells React to increment by one with previous value setCount(a => a + 1); }, 1000); return () => { clearInterval(interval); }; }, []); return <div> prev normal count is {count} </div>; }
Solution 3 — useRef
import React, { useRef, useState, useEffect } from "react";export default function SetInterval() { const [count, setCount] = useState(0); const ref = useRef(); ref.current = count; useEffect(() => { const interval = setInterval(() => { console.log("interval count", ref.current); setCount(ref.current + 1); }, 1000); return () => { clearInterval(interval); }; }, []); return <div> ref count is {count} </div>; }
Notice
- If you want to follow the latest news/articles for the series of my blogs, Please 「Watch」 to Subscribe.
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《React Hooks — The Ins and Outs》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
JavaScript凌厉开发
张鑫 黄灯桥、杨彦强 / 清华大学出版社 / 2010 年4月 / 49.00元
本书详细介绍Ext JS框架体系结构,以及利用HTML/CSS/JavaScript进行前端设计的方法和技巧。作者为Ext中文站站长领衔的三个国内Ext JS先锋,在开发思维和开发经验上有着无可争议的功力。 本书包含的内容有Ext.Element.*、事件Observable、Ext组件+MVC原理、Grid/Form/Tree/ComboBox、Ajax缓存Store等,并照顾JavaSc......一起来看看 《JavaScript凌厉开发》 这本书的介绍吧!