内容简介:ThevMotion feature is heavily updated in vSphere 7, resulting in faster live-migrations while drastically lowering the guest performance impact during the vMotion process together with a far more efficient way of switching over the virtual machine (VM) bet
ThevMotion feature is heavily updated in vSphere 7, resulting in faster live-migrations while drastically lowering the guest performance impact during the vMotion process together with a far more efficient way of switching over the virtual machine (VM) between the source and destination ESXi host. vSphere 7 also introduces improvements for the Fast Suspend and Resume (FSR) process, as FSR inherents some of the vMotion logic.
FSR is used when live-migrating VM storage withStorage vMotion, but also for VM Hot Add. Hot Add is the capability to add vCPU, memory and other selected VM hardware devices to a powered-on VM. When the VM is powered-off, adding compute resources or virtual hardware devices is just a .vmx configuration file change. FSR is used for to do the same for live VMs.
Note:using vCPU Hot Add can introduce a workload performance impact as explained in this article .
The FSR Process
FSR has a lot of similarities to thevMotion process. The biggest difference being that FSR is a local live-migration. Local meaning within the same ESXi host. For a compute vMotion, we need to copy the memory data from the source to destination ESXi host. With FSR, the memory pages remain within the same host.
When a Storage vMotion is initiated or when Hot Add is used, a destination VM is created. This name can be misleading, it is a ‘ghost’ VM running on the same ESXi host as where the source VM is running. When the ‘destination’ VM is created, the FSR process suspends the source VM from execution before it transfers the device state and the memory metadata. Because the migration is local to the host, there’s no need to copy memory pages, but only the metadata. Once this is done, the destination VM will be resumed and the source VM is cleaned up, powered off and deleted.
As with vMotion, we need to keep the time between suspending and resuming the VM to be < 1 second to minimize guest OS impact. Typically, that was never a problem for smaller VM sizings. However, with large workloads (‘Monster’ VMs), the impact could be significant depending on VM sizing and workload characteristics.
How is Memory Metadata Transferred?
During a FSR process, the most time is consumed in transferring the memory metadata. You can see the memory metadata as pointers for the VM to understand where the data in global system memory is placed. Memory metadata is using Page Frames (PFrames), which provides the mapping between the VM its virtual memory and the actual Machine Page Numbers (MPN), which identifies the data in physical memory.
Because there’s no need to copy memory data, FSR just needs to copy over the metadata (PFrames) to the destination VM on the same host, telling it where to look for data in the system memory.
In vSphere versions prior to vSphere 7, the transfer of the memory metadata is single threaded. Only one vCPU is claimed and used to transfer the PFrames in batches. All other vCPUs are sleeping during the metadata transfer, as the VM is briefly suspended. This method is okay for smaller sized VMs, but could introduce a challenge for large VMs, especially with a large memory footprint.
The single threaded transfer doesn’t scale with large VM configurations, potentially resulting in switch-over times over 1 second. So, as with vMotion in vSphere 7, there’s a need to lower the switch-over time (aka stun-time) when using FSR.
Improved FSR in vSphere 7
So, why not use all the VM its vCPUs to transfer the PFrames? Remember that the VM is suspended during the metadata transfer, so there’s no point in letting the vCPUs stay in an idle state. Let’s put them to work for speeding up the transfer of the PFrames. The VMs memory is divided into segments and each vCPU is assigned a memory metadata segment to transfer.
In vSphere 7, the FSR logic moved from a serialized method, to a distributed model. The PFrames transfer is now distributed over all vCPUs that are configured for the VM, and the transfers run in parallel.
The Effect of Leveraging all vCPUs
The net result of leveraging all the vCPUs for memory metadata transfers during a FSR process, is drastically lowered switch-over times. The performance team tested multiple VM configurations and workloads. Using a VM configured with 1TB of memory and 48 vCPU’s, they experienced a switch-over cut down from 7.7 seconds using 1 vCPU for metadata transfer, to 500 milliseconds when utilizing all vCPUs!
The FSR improvements depend strongly on VM sizing and workload characteristics. With vSphere version up to 6.7, there was a challenge with the 1 sec SLA when using Storage vMotion or Hot Add operations. With vSphere 7, customers can again feel comfortable using these capabilities because of the lowered switch-over times!
More Resources to Learn
- How to Tune vMotion for Lower Migration Times?
- vSphere 7 – Why Upgrade? Here’s What Beta Participants Think!
- Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (EVC) Explained
We are excited about vSphere 7 and what it means for our customers and the future. Watch the vSphere 7 Launch Event replay , an event designed for vSphere Admins, hosted by theCUBE. We will continue posting new technical and product information aboutvSphere 7 and vSphere with Kubernetes Monday through Thursdays into May 2020. Join us by following the blog directly using theRSS feed, on Facebook , and on Twitter . Thank you, and stay safe!
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
WWW信息体系结构(影印版第2版)
Louis Rosenfeld / 清华大学出版社 / 2003-6 / 49.8
如今的网站和内联网已经变得比以前越来越大,越来越有价值,而且越来越复杂,同时其用户也变得更忙,也更加不能容忍错误的发生。数目庞大的信息、快速的变化、新兴的技术和公司策略是设计师、信息体系结构构建师和网站管理员必须面对的事情,而这些已经让某些网让看起来像是个快速增长却规划很差的城市——到处都是路,却无法导航。规划精良的信息体系结构当前正是最关键性的。 本书介绍的是如何使用美学和机械学的理念创建......一起来看看 《WWW信息体系结构(影印版第2版)》 这本书的介绍吧!