I spent many years working with founders and now I work with researchers.
Although there are always individual exceptions, on average it’s surprising to me how different the best people in these groups are (including in some qualities that I had assumed were present in great people everywhere, like very high levels of self-belief).
So I’ve been thinking about the ways they’re the same, because maybe there is something to learn about qualities of really effective people in general.
The best people in both groups spend a lot of time reflecting on some version of the Hamming question—"what are the most important problems in your field, and why aren’t you working on them?” In general, no one reflects on this question enough, but the best people do it the most, and have the best ‘problem taste’, which is some combination of learning to think independently, reason about the future, and identify attack vectors. (This from John Schulman is worth reading: http://joschu.net/blog/opinionated-guide-ml-research.html ).
They have a laser focus on the next step in front of them combined with long-term vision. Most people only have one or the other.
They are extremely persistent and willing to work hard. As far as I can tell, there is no high-probability way to be very successful without this, and you should be suspicious of people who tell you otherwise unless you’d be happy having their career (and be especially suspicious if they worked hard themselves).
They have a bias towards action and trying things, and they’re clear-eyed and honest about what is working and what isn’t (importantly, this goes both ways—I’m amazed by how many people will see something working and then not pursue it).
They are creative idea-generators—a lot of the ideas may be terrible, but there is never a shortage.
They really value autonomy and have a hard time with rules that they don’t think make sense. They are definitely not lemmings.
Their motivations are often more complex than they seem—specifically, they are frequently very driven by genuine curiosity.
以上就是本文的全部内容，希望对大家的学习有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:
本站部分资源来源于网络，本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的，版权归原作者或者来源机构所有，如转载稿涉及版权问题，请联系我们。
Python 3学习笔记（上卷）
雨痕 / 电子工业出版社 / 2018-1 / 89
经过9 年的发展，Python 3 生态已相当成熟。无论是语言进化、解释器性能提升，还是第三方支持，都是如此。随着Python 2.7 EOF 日趋临近，迁移到Python 3 的各种障碍也被逐一剔除。是时候在新环境下学习或工作了。 人们常说Python 简单易学，但这是以封装和隐藏复杂体系为代价的。仅阅读语言规范很难深入，亦无从发挥其应有能力，易学难精才是常态。《Python 3学习笔记（......一起来看看 《Python 3学习笔记（上卷）》 这本书的介绍吧!
