内容简介:The first demo of the language that was to become JavaScript took placeThe language was released, as LiveScirpt, in a beta of Netscape Navigator in the fall of 1995, and renamed to JavaScript later that year. Sometime late that year I began work on the fir
The first demo of the language that was to become JavaScript took place almost exactly 25 years ago .
The language was released, as LiveScirpt, in a beta of Netscape Navigator in the fall of 1995, and renamed to JavaScript later that year. Sometime late that year I began work on the first edition (O’Reilly published it as the “beta edition”) of JavaScript: The Definitive Guide , and it was published in August of 1996, meaning that it is going on 24 years old now.
With the seventh edition coming out in just a few weeks, I want to take a trip down memory lane and blog about some old weird features of JavaScript and of the early web platform that we can now, mercifully, forget about.One of the reasons that the new 7th edition is thinner than the 6th edition is that I’ve removed the reference section . But in addition, I found that there was a lot of stuff that was simply no longer relevant to web developers in 2020. Web compatibility is forever (or for at least more than 25 years) so browser vendors may need to keep supporting old and obscure language and platform features for a long time to come. But there is no need for the rest of us to clutter our minds with them anymore.
So here are some JavaScript and Web platform features that no longer bulk up the page count of JavaScript: The Definitive Guide . I’m happy to say goodbye to them. (I feel myself winding up for a bit of a rant here, so be warned that this is not carefully researched; just my memories of how things were in the bad old days):
-
The
arguments
object has been completely obviated by the introduction of...args
in ES6. It was always difficult to explain the weird way it interacted with named arguments and to always caution about its performance implications. You may still see it in legacy code and you may be reminded of its presence if you try to name a local variable or function parameterarguments
in strict mode, but now that we have rest arguments, it should be allowed to slink into oblivion. -
We used to have to worry about the performance of repeated string concatenation. There was a period of where we all learned to push strings onto an array, and then use
join()
to concatenate everything at the end. Then JavaScript got fast and we were all “Well, actually” and unlearned that pattern. And now with template literals, who even uses string concatenation anymore! -
document.write()
was pretty much the main feature of JavaScript at the very beginning, before the DOM. (If you did not use JavaScript in the 20th century, you may not know that there was a time before the DOM, but it is true. There was a property you could set to change the background color of a web page, but no way to actually alter the document tree once the document had been parsed.) IIRC you could even insert scripts into a document withdocument.write()
, but you had to be careful to break the closing</script>
tag into two strings so that the HTML parser wouldn’t interpret it as the end of the currently-running script. -
HTML didn’t have an
<iframe>
in the early days, but there was<frameset>
and<frame>
. Thewindow.frames
property was an array of the nested window objects that represented the frames in a document. It was possible to actually call theopen()
method of a document in a frame, and then usedocument.write()
to dynamically generate an entire document inside that frame. That was kind of cool, actually. Because frames could be nested inside other frames, every Window object had aframes
array that contained its children frames, and aparent
property that referred to the containing window, and atop
property that referred to the toplevel window. Earlier editions of my book dedicated long sections and complicated figures to explaining all of this. -
There are all kinds of obsolete techniques for referring to particular elements within a document. The
frames
array was one, but, IIRC, there were alsolinks
andimages
arrays as well that were literally just a list of all the links and images in a document. IE (version 4, I think) went all-in and introduceddocument.all
: an array of all elements in the document. (This was the beginning of the DOM and of “DHTML”—kind of like the first fish that crawled onto dry land.)document.all
had all kinds of weird features: it was an array that also had methods for looking up elements by name or something like that.document.all
was never standardized, but even the standard methods likedocument.getElementById()
,document.getElementsByName()
,document.getElementsByTagName()
anddocument.getElementsByClassName()
seem obsolete today, crushed into irrelevance by jQuery’s$()
function and the standarddocument.querySelector()
anddocument.querySelectorAll()
methods that it inspired. Through the power of CSS selectors those two functions obsolete everything that came before. -
The thing I hated most about Internet Explorer was that it used an
attachEvent()
method for registering event handlers. In my memory, they did this even though the standardaddEventListener()
had already been defined, and that really annoyed me. Events and event handling were one of the biggest sources of incompatibility on the web, and for years JavaScript programmers (and JavaScript book authors) had to deal with a lengthy list of differences between the IE event model and the standard event model. Event handling code had to be written twice: once for IE and once for Firefox. Book chapters about events were twice as long as they needed to be because there were two similar, but completely incompatible ways of dealing with them. One of the major features of jQuery was that it implemented its own event compatibility layer so you only had to know about jQuery events, and I suspect that this was an important reason for its popularity. -
The original DOM API was defined during the era of magical thinking about XML. (People really seemed to believe for a couple of years that XML was going to solve all data problems. It was a strange time.) Somehow the W3C committed that defined the DOM API got infiltrated by Java people who felt it was appropriate to define a single API to be used by JavaScript programmers working with HTML documents and Java programmers working with XML data. That’s why we have weird things like Attr nodes (which are best ignored). One of the things that always bugged me about the DOM Level 3 API was that to remove an element
e
from the document, you couldn’t just writee.remove()
as we would today. You actually had to writee.parentNode.removeChild(e)
.
Anyway, it is 2020 now and I promise that the new 7th edition of my book will not subject you to lengthy explanations of any of those old features that are best left forgotten.
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
无懈可击的Web设计
【美】Dan Cederholm / 马跃 / 清华大学出版社 / 2012-5 / 39.00元
本书将指导您采用标准设计策略来满足以各种方式浏览网页的各类用户的需要。每章首先列举一个沿用传统HTML技术的实例,然后指出该实例的局限性,并利用XHTML和CSS对其进行重构。从中您将学会如何用简洁高效的HTML标记和CSS来取代臃肿的代码,从而创建加载速度极快、能供所有用户使用的网站。本书最后将前面各章讨论的所有页面组件珠联璧合地结合在一起,制作了一个页面模板。这一版全面润色和更新了上一版本,介......一起来看看 《无懈可击的Web设计》 这本书的介绍吧!