内容简介:Implementation of theThis is the easiest way of getting started with leader election. A task will be continuously invoked in the background while the
goNELI
Implementation of the NELI leader election protocol for Go and Kafka. goNELI encapsulates the 'fast' variation of the protocol, running in exclusive mode over a group of contending processes.
Getting started
Add the dependency
go get -u github.com/obsidiandynamics/goneli
Go import
import "github.com/obsidiandynamics/goneli"
Basic leader election
This is the easiest way of getting started with leader election. A task will be continuously invoked in the background while the Neli
instance is the leader of its group.
// Create a new Neli curator. neli, err := New(Config{ KafkaConfig: KafkaConfigMap{ "bootstrap.servers": "localhost:9092", }, LeaderGroupID: "my-app-name.group", LeaderTopic: "my-app-name.topic", }) if err != nil { panic(err) } // Starts a pulser Goroutine in the background, which will automatically terminate when Neli is closed. p, _ := neli.Background(func() { // An activity performed by the client application if it is the elected leader. This task should // perform a small amount of work that is exclusively attributable to a leader, and return immediately. // For as long as the associated Neli instance is the leader, this task will be invoked repeatedly; // therefore, it should break down any long-running work into bite-sized chunks that can be safely // performed without causing excessive blocking. log.Printf("Do important leader stuff") time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) }) // Blocks until Neli is closed or an unrecoverable error occurs. panic(p.Await())
Full control
Sometimes more control is needed. For example —
Neli
// Additional imports for the logger and Scribe bindings. import ( scribelogrus "github.com/obsidiandynamics/libstdgo/scribe/logrus" logrus "github.com/sirupsen/logrus" )
// Bootstrap a custom logger. log := logrus.StandardLogger() log.SetLevel(logrus.TraceLevel) // Configure Neli. config := Config{ KafkaConfig: KafkaConfigMap{ "bootstrap.servers": "localhost:9092", }, Scribe: scribe.New(scribelogrus.Bind()), LeaderGroupID: "my-app-name.group", LeaderTopic: "my-app-name.topic", } // Handler of leader status updates. Used to initialise state upon leader acquisition, and to // wrap up in-flight work upon loss of leader status. barrier := func(e Event) { switch e.(type) { case LeaderAcquired: // The application may initialise any state necessary to perform work as a leader. log.Infof("Received event: leader elected") case LeaderRevoked: // The application may block the Barrier callback until it wraps up any in-flight // activity. Only upon returning from the callback, will a new leader be elected. log.Infof("Received event: leader revoked") case LeaderFenced: // The application must immediately terminate any ongoing activity, on the assumption // that another leader may be imminently elected. Unlike the handling of LeaderRevoked, // blocking in the Barrier callback will not prevent a new leader from being elected. log.Infof("Received event: leader fenced") } } // Create a new Neli curator, supplying the barrier as an optional argument. neli, err := New(config, barrier) if err != nil { panic(err) } // Pulsing is done in a separate Goroutine. (We don't have to, but it's often practical to do so.) go func() { defer neli.Close() for { // Pulse our presence, allowing for some time to acquire leader status. // Will return instantly if already leader. isLeader, err := neli.Pulse(10 * time.Millisecond) if err != nil { // Only fatal errors are returned from Pulse(). panic(err) } if isLeader { // We hold leader status... can safely do some work. // Avoid blocking for too long, otherwise we may miss a poll and lose leader status. log.Infof("Do important leader stuff") time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) } } }() // Blocks until Neli is closed. neli.Await()
Why NELI
Traditionally, leader election is performed using an Atomic Broadcast protocol, which provides a consistent view across a set of processes. Given that implementing consensus protocols is not trivial (even with the aid of libraries), most applications will defer to an external Group Management Service (GMS) or a Distributed Lock Manager (DLM) for arbitrating leadership among contending processes.
A DLM/GMS, such as Consul , Etcd , Chubby or ZooKeeper , is an appropriate choice in many cases. A crucial point raised by the NELI paper (and the main reason for its existence) is that infrastructure may not be readily available to provide this capability. Further to that point, someone needs to configure and maintain this infrastructure, and ensure its continuous availability — otherwise it becomes a point of failure in itself. This problem is exacerbated in a µ-services architecture, where it is common-practice for services to own their dependencies. Should DLMs be classified as service-specific dependencies, or should they be shared? Either approach has its downsides.
Rather than embedding a separate consensus protocol such as PAXOS or Raft , or using an external service, NELI piggy-backs on Kafka's existing leader election mechanism — the same mechanism used for electing internal group and transaction coordinators within Kafka. NELI provides the necessary consensus without forcing the implementers to deal with the intricacies of group management and atomic broadcast.
Under NELI, leaders aren't agreed upon directly, but induced through other phenomena that are observable by the affected group members, allowing them to individually infer leadership. A member of a group can autonomously determine whether it is a leader or not. In the latter case, it cannot determine which process is the real leader, only that it is a process other than itself. While the information carried through NELI is not as comprehensive as an equivalent Atomic Broadcast, it is sufficient for leader election.
How it works
When a NELI client starts, it has no knowledge of whether it is a leader or a standby process. It uses an internal Kafka consumer client to subscribe to a topic specified by Config.LeaderTopic
, using the Config.LeaderGroupID
consumer group. These parameters may be chosen arbitrarily; however, they must be shared by all members of the encompassing process group, and may not be shared with members of unrelated process groups. As part of the subscription, a rebalance listener callback is registered with the Kafka consumer — to be notified of partition reassignments.
No matter the chosen topic, it will always (by definition) have at least one partition — partition zero . It may carry other partitions too — indexes 1 through to N-1 , where N is the topic width, but these may be disregarded. Ultimately, Kafka will assign at most one owner to any given partition — picking one consumer from the encompassing consumer group. (We say 'at most' because all consumers might be offline.) For partition zero, one process will be assigned ownership; others will be kept in a holding pattern — waiting for the current assignee to depart.
Having subscribed to the topic, the client will repeatedly poll Kafka for new messages. Polling is essential, as Kafka uses the polling mechanism as a way of verifying consumer liveness . (Under the hood, a Kafka client sends periodic heartbeats, which are tied to topic polling.) Should a consumer stop polling, heartbeats will stop flowing and Kafka's group coordinator will presume the client has died — reassigning partition ownership among the remaining clients. The client issues a poll at an interval specified by Config.MinPollInterval
, defaulting to 100 ms.
Once the client discovers that it has been assigned partition zero, it will set a pair of internal flags isAssigned
and isLeader
. The former indicating that the client owns partition zero; the latter indicating that it is the assumed leader. It will also invoke the optionally supplied Barrier
callback with a LeaderAcquired
event, allowing the application to handle the leadership assignment. (For example, to initialise the necessary state before commencing its work.)
Kafka's group coordinator may later choose to reassign the partition to another process. This occurs if the current leader times out, or if the population of contending processes changes. Either way, a leadership change is picked up via the rebalance callback. If the current leader sees that partition zero has been revoked, it will clear both flags and invoke the Barrier
callback with a LeaderRevoked
event.
The rebalance callback straightforwardly determines leadership through partition assignment, where the latter is managed by Kafka's group coordinator. The use of the callback requires a stable network connection to the Kafka cluster; otherwise, if a network partition occurs, another client may be granted partition ownership behind the scenes — an event which is not synchronized with the outgoing leader. (Kafka's internal heartbeats are used to signal client presence to the broker, but they are not generally suitable for identifying network partitions.)
In addition to observing partition assignment changes, the owner of partition zero periodically publishes a heartbeat message to Config.LeaderTopic
. The client also consumes messages from that topic — effectively observing its own heartbeats, and thereby asserting that it is connected to the cluster and still owns the partition in question. If no heartbeat is received within the period specified by Config.ReceiveDeadline
(5 seconds by default), the leader will clear the isLeader
lag, while maintaining isAssigned
. It will then forward a LeaderFenced
event to the Barrier
callback, taking the worst-case assumption that the partition will be reassigned. If connectivity is later resumed while the process is still the owner of the partition on the broker, it will again receive a heartbeat, allowing it to resume the leader role. If the partition has been subsequently reassigned, no heartbeat messages will be received upon reconnection and the client will be forced to rejoin the group — the act of which will invoke the rebalance callback, effectively resetting the client.
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Leader Election Using Apache Kafka》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
The Photoshop Anthology
Corrie Haffly / SitePoint Pty. Ltd. / 2006 / USD 39.95
The Photoshop Anthology is full-color, question-and-answer book for Web Designers who want to use Photoshop to build Websites and create better looking web graphics more effectively. The book covers: ......一起来看看 《The Photoshop Anthology》 这本书的介绍吧!