This is the bi-weekly visible open thread (there are also hidden open threads twice a week you can reach through the Open Thread tab on the top of the page). Post about anything you want, but please try to avoid hot-button political and social topics. You can also talk at the SSC subreddit – and also check out the SSC Podcast . Also:
1. Comment of the week:Bean questions The Precipice ‘s assessment of nuclear winter, links back to a comment thread from years ago challenging the Robock paper Ord relies on.
2. New sidebar ad: this one is for SafetyWing, which bills itself as “Norwegian founders with an international team on a mission to offer the equivalent of a Norwegian social safety net globally available as a membership – currently offering travel medical insurance for nomads , and global health insurance for remote teams .” It also has a Medium article where it claims its end goal is to build a country on the Internet , which is a delightfully tech-startup-Medium-article thing to claim.
3. As always, I apologize for being bad at answering emails. In some cases, I am weeks behind. In other cases, I am grateful for what you have to say but have given up on responding. In others, I have said “that’s interesting, I’ll check it out” while secretly knowing that I will never do that. Expect this kind of thing to continue.
4. Dan Wahl has an automated Unsong audiobook .
5. Calling researchers and lawyers – does anyone know the legalities of running an informal study without IRB approval? IE, if I were to email the SSC mailing list recommending people try a certain vitamin, nobody would think twice of it. If I were to email the SSC mailing list asking people with last names A-M to try the vitamin, and people with last names N-Z not to, and to record their results and send them to me, how much trouble would I be in? If the answer is “not much”, what does the requirement that “studies” have an IRB mean? Where do you cross the line from neat decentralized science experiment to official study, and what happens to people if they end up on the wrong side of it?
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望对大家的学习有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
谷歌和亚马逊如何做产品
梅 (Chris Vander Mey) / 刘亦舟 / 人民邮电出版社 / 2014-6-1 / CNY 49.00
软件在交付之前,面临产品、方案、项目和工程管理等诸多挑战,如何做到游刃有余并打造出极致产品?本书作者曾任谷歌和亚马逊高级产品经理、现任Facebook产品经理,他将自己在达特茅斯学院钻研的理论知识和在领先的互联网公司十年的工作经验尽数总结在此,从定义产品开始,一步步指导你完成管理项目、迭代、发布、市场推广等交付流程,让你身临其境地体验到极致产品如何取得成功。 本书主要内容: 如何清晰定......一起来看看 《谷歌和亚马逊如何做产品》 这本书的介绍吧!