内容简介:Gts-7.0-r4工具报出失败项GtsSecurityHostTestCasescom.google.android.security.gts.SELinuxHostTest#testNoExemptionsForSocketsBetweenCoreAndVendorBan
【GTS-Fail】GtsSecurityHostTestCases#testNoExemptionsForSocketsBetweenCoreAndVendorBan
【问题描述】
Gts-7.0-r4 工具 报出失败项
GtsSecurityHostTestCases
com.google.android.security.gts.SELinuxHostTest#testNoExemptionsForSocketsBetweenCoreAndVendorBan
<Failure message="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Policy exempts domains from ban on socket communications between core and vendor: [hal_audio_default]"> <StackTrace>junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Policy exempts domains from ban on socket communications between core and vendor: [hal_audio_default] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57) at junit.framework.TestCase.fail(TestCase.java:227) at com.google.android.security.gts.SELinuxHostTest.testNoExemptionsForSocketsBetweenCoreAndVendorBan(SELinuxHostTest.java:221)
这里有个坑,报问题的时候说上个版本有,其实最终查证0004版本(2.20前)就有这个失败项了,当时芯片厂商也告知是waiver项了。。。
【问题结论】
是waiver项
失败项是由google的auto-patch代码导致,如果第一次遇到可以咨询aml是否waiver。
【分析详细】
测试逻辑总览
使用 linux 可执行程序:sepolicy-analyze,对机顶盒中的/sys/fs/selinux/policy文件进行解析,要求不能有返回值,命令是:
sepolicy-analyze policy attribute socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators
即:不允许有type(类型)与该attribute(属性)“socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators”有关联,字面意思:core与vendor的违规socket特权
system/sepolicy/tools/sepolicy-analyze/README
ATTRIBUTE (attribute)
sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/
该权限详细限制在以下代码中有论述,Android TREBLE架构解耦计划相关
system/sepolicy/prebuilts/api/26.0/public/domain.te
system/sepolicy/prebuilts/api/27.0/public/domain.te
system/sepolicy/prebuilts/api/28.0/public/domain.te:
system/sepolicy/public/domain.te
# On full TREBLE devices, socket communications between core components and vendor components are # not permitted. full_treble_only(` # Most general rules first, more specific rules below. # Core domains are not permitted to initiate communications to vendor domain sockets. # We are not restricting the use of already established sockets because it is fine for a process # to obtain an already established socket via some public/official/stable API and then exchange # data with its peer over that socket. The wire format in this scenario is dicatated by the API # and thus does not break the core-vendor separation.
梳理测试项逻辑
反编译后定位测试项
./com/google/android/security/gts/SELinuxHostTest.java
public void testNoExemptionsForVendorExecutingCore() throws Exception { if (isFullTrebleDevice()) { Set<String> types = sepolicyAnalyzeGetTypesAssociatedWithAttribute("vendor_executes_system_violators");//该语句是测试判断,返回测试结果 if (!types.isEmpty()) { List<String> sortedTypes = new ArrayList(types); Collections.sort(sortedTypes); fail("Policy exempts vendor domains from ban on executing files in /system: " + sortedTypes);//此处assert,原因是容器types有东西,东西就是‘[hal_audio_default]’ } } }
看一下方法的测试逻辑:sepolicyAnalyzeGetTypesAssociatedWithAttribute()
通过ProcessBuilder开启一个进程,用于执行linux命令:sepolicy-analyze policy attribute socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators
然后获取这个命令的标准输出进行结果判断
private Set<String> sepolicyAnalyzeGetTypesAssociatedWithAttribute(String attribute) throws Exception { BufferedReader in; Throwable th; Throwable th2; Set<String> types = new HashSet(); //通过ProcessBuilder开启一个进程,用于执行linux命令:sepolicy-analyze policy attribute socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder(new String[]{this.mSepolicyAnalyze.getAbsolutePath(), this.mDevicePolicyFile.getAbsolutePath(), "attribute", attribute}); ...... in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream())); th = null; while (true) { try { String type = in.readLine(); if (type != null) { types.add(type.trim());//获取有效标准输出,写到结果容器中存储 }}} ...... return types; ...... }
现在基本逻辑就清楚了,只要这个命令执行有结果返回就是不被允许的,现在需要分析这个工具‘sepolicy-analyze’是干嘛的?
在Android工程源码中搜索,我们找到了这个host可执行程序的源码
system/sepolicy/tools/sepolicy-analyze/
结合网络资料以及阅读源码和README文档,澄清测试的命令用途:解析policy文件返回与attribute相关联的type值
system/sepolicy/tools/sepolicy-analyze/README
63 ATTRIBUTE (attribute)
65
66 Displays the types associated with the specified attribute name.
工程中搜索确认
搜过确认一下到底在哪里使得他们关联的,定位到一下te文件
./system/sepolicy/vendor/hal_audio_default.te:1 type hal_audio_default, domain, socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators;
查证git log,我们发现是如下的commit导致的,是google的auto-path
commit 783f5b52195f0168f4c9db29b5a80ac63fb04020 Author: xxxxxx Date: Mon Feb 17 11:33:16 2020 +0800 auto patch added:CecAudio diff --git a/vendor/hal_audio_default.te b/vendor/hal_audio_default.te index 0dc2170..9da0f1b 100644 --- a/vendor/hal_audio_default.te +++ b/vendor/hal_audio_default.te @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -type hal_audio_default, domain; +type hal_audio_default, domain, socket_between_core_and_vendor_violators; #此处添加的关联,问题找到了根源 hal_server_domain(hal_audio_default, hal_audio)
到此,问题很大概率可确认为Google-waiver,因为引入问题的代码是Google的。接下来需向芯片厂商或Google沟通确认
由于报问题的乌龙,事实是该问题很久之前已澄清过,所以这一通分析并木有什么卵用。。。。。。
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望对大家的学习有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
AI Algorithms, Data Structures, and Idioms in Prolog, Lisp, and
George F. Luger、William A Stubblefield / Addison Wesley / 2008-09-04 / USD 22.20
This book is designed for three primary purposes. The first is as a programming language component of a general class in Artificial Intelligence. From this viewpoint, the authors see as essential that......一起来看看 《AI Algorithms, Data Structures, and Idioms in Prolog, Lisp, and 》 这本书的介绍吧!