内容简介:Composition over inheritance is the principle that classes should achieve polymorphic behavior and code reuse by their composition (by containing instances of other classes that implement the desired functionality) rather than inheritance from a base or pa
Composition over inheritance is the principle that classes should achieve polymorphic behavior and code reuse by their composition (by containing instances of other classes that implement the desired functionality) rather than inheritance from a base or parent class.
In computer science classes you get to learn a ton about inheritance. You study the different programming languages and how they implement inheritance (or multiple inheritance) in the name of polymorphism.
A simple inheritance example is having a base/parent class that many more classes are extending, potentially for more than one level:
open class Parent { fun parentFunctionality() {} } open class Child(): Parent() { fun childFunctionality() {} } class Grandchild constructor() : Child() { fun grandchildFunctionality() {} }
An instance of Grandchild
will be able to use childFunctionality()
and parentFunctionality()
But in real-world software engineering, inheritance is not that desirable. There's even a software engineering principle against inheritance!
The example above would look like this using composition:
open class Parent { fun parentFunctionality() {} } open class Child() { private val parent = Parent() fun parentFunctionality() { parent.parentFunctionality() } fun childFunctionality() {} } class Grandchild { private val parent = Parent() private val child = Child() fun parentFunctionality() { parent.parentFunctionality() } fun childFunctionality() { child.childFunctionality() } fun grandchildFunctionality() {} }
But why follow this pattern when it's more verbose? And when should someone prefer composition over inheritance? Should we avoid it at all times?
There are plenty of advantages for going with composition:
- Testability : You just swipe the real implementation with the fake one. Especially convenient with a dependency injection framework.
- Maintainability : Multilevel inheritance can make the code hard to read and comprehend, especially for people unfamiliar with the codebase. Composition is simpler, but maybe a bit more verbose.
Kotlinprovides some feature to make composition easier:
- Objects : Essentially they are singleton values defined with their own keyword. The first time they are used an instance will be created and all the following invocations will use the same (single) instance. Especially useful if you do not use a dependency injection framework and you need singleton instances around your app.
object Parent { fun parentFunctionality() {} } object Child { private val parent = Parent [...] fun childFunctionality() {} } object Grandchild { private val parent = Parent private val child = Child [...] fun grandchildFunctionality() {} }
- Lazy : Useful if you want an instance only the first time a property is used. All the following invocations will use the instance that was created the first time.
open class Parent { fun parentFunctionality() {} } open class Child() { val parent by lazy { Parent() } [...] fun childFunctionality() {} } class Grandchild { val parent by lazy { Parent() } val child by lazy { Child() } [...] fun grandchildFunctionality() {} }
- Extension methods : Not exactly composition, but can be used in the place of inheritance. This is for "virtually" extending a class, even if it's not allowed (e.g. Android system classes).
class SystemClass { [...] } fun SystemClass.newFunctionality() {} SystemClass().newFunctionality()
Still, I think there are cases that inheritance should be used instead of composition:
- If you only need 1 level of inheritance, it's easier (and more readable) than composition. When you need more levels, maybe you should switch to composition.
- When you need to implement an interface, you have to use inheritance. The rule that you should try is to implement "interface inheritance", rather the "functional inheritance". Try to "inherit" functionality using composition.
Happy coding with more readable code! (what "readable" means is a discussion for another post :)
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
C++沉思录
Andrew Koenig、Barbara Moo / 黄晓春、孟岩(审校) / 人民邮电出版社 / 2002-11-01 / 50.00元
《C++ 沉思录》集中反映了C++的关键思想和编程技术,不仅告诉你如何编程,还告诉你为什么要这样编程。本书曾出现在众多的C++专家推荐书目中。 这将是C++程序员的必读之作。因为: 它包含了丰富的C++思想和技术,从详细的代码实例总结出程序设计的原则和方法。 不仅教你如何遵循规则,还教你如何思考C++编程。 既包括面向对象编程也包括泛型编程。 探究STL这一近年来C++最重要的新成果的内在思想。一起来看看 《C++沉思录》 这本书的介绍吧!