内容简介:This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was no
This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was not aborting, but instead moved along a couple of commits and then got stuck at some more conflicts.
Were not all aborts created equal? Maybe sometimes in order to abort you need to go forward first, and git was hitting conflicts along the way? I wasn't quite ready to give up my understanding of how rebasing works, so I took a look at the code
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
options := []string{"continue", "abort"}
if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
options = append(options, "skip")
}
menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
for i, option := range options {
menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
displayString: option,
onPress: func() error {
return gui.genericMergeCommand(option)
},
}
}
...
Can you spot the bug?
The logic was simple: create a slice of strings representing the different options available, and then create menu items to show in the GUI, where if you pressed say 'abort', lazygit would run git rebase --abort .
I checked for an off-by-one error on the index: perhaps the menu items started counting from 1 instead of zero? Nope.
Turns out lazygit actually ran 'git rebase --skip', which explained why it would continue the rebase and then stop again. And then it struck me: skip was the last string in the slice. It just so happens that when a function inside a loop closes over a loop variable, it ends up referring to the final value of that variable, because on each iteration of the loop the loop variable's value is reassigned. In this case, the last value was the last item in the options slice, i.e. 'skip'.
So I added a variable which was scoped to the inside of the loop, to assign the value of the loop variable for that iteration. Unlike closures which work on references, direct assignments just take the value of the variable at the time of assignment, meaning its value wasn't going to change no matter what happened in future iterations.
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
options := []string{"continue", "abort"}
if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
options = append(options, "skip")
}
menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
for i, option := range options {
// note to self. Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function
innerOption := option
menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
displayString: innerOption,
onPress: func() error {
return gui.genericMergeCommand(innerOption)
},
}
}
And voilà! The bug was fixed, and lazygit's questionable reputation as a reliable git GUI was preserved for another day.
Lesson learnt: Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function definition!
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Golang Gotcha of the Day》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
Python金融衍生品大数据分析:建模、模拟、校准与对冲
【德】Yves Hilpisch(伊夫·希尔皮斯科) / 蔡立耑 / 电子工业出版社 / 2017-8 / 99.00
Python 在衍生工具分析领域占据重要地位,使机构能够快速、有效地提供定价、交易及风险管理的结果。《Python金融衍生品大数据分析:建模、模拟、校准与对冲》精心介绍了有效定价期权的四个领域:基于巿场定价的过程、完善的巿场模型、数值方法及技术。书中的内容分为三个部分。第一部分着眼于影响股指期权价值的风险,以及股票和利率的相关实证发现。第二部分包括套利定价理论、离散及连续时间的风险中性定价,并介绍......一起来看看 《Python金融衍生品大数据分析:建模、模拟、校准与对冲》 这本书的介绍吧!