内容简介:This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was no
This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was not aborting, but instead moved along a couple of commits and then got stuck at some more conflicts.
Were not all aborts created equal? Maybe sometimes in order to abort you need to go forward first, and git was hitting conflicts along the way? I wasn't quite ready to give up my understanding of how rebasing works, so I took a look at the code
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error { options := []string{"continue", "abort"} if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" { options = append(options, "skip") } menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options)) for i, option := range options { menuItems[i] = &menuItem{ displayString: option, onPress: func() error { return gui.genericMergeCommand(option) }, } } ...
Can you spot the bug?
The logic was simple: create a slice of strings representing the different options available, and then create menu items to show in the GUI, where if you pressed say 'abort', lazygit would run git rebase --abort
.
I checked for an off-by-one error on the index: perhaps the menu items started counting from 1 instead of zero? Nope.
Turns out lazygit actually ran 'git rebase --skip', which explained why it would continue the rebase and then stop again. And then it struck me: skip was the last string in the slice. It just so happens that when a function inside a loop closes over a loop variable, it ends up referring to the final value of that variable, because on each iteration of the loop the loop variable's value is reassigned. In this case, the last value was the last item in the options
slice, i.e. 'skip'.
So I added a variable which was scoped to the inside of the loop, to assign the value of the loop variable for that iteration. Unlike closures which work on references, direct assignments just take the value of the variable at the time of assignment, meaning its value wasn't going to change no matter what happened in future iterations.
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error { options := []string{"continue", "abort"} if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" { options = append(options, "skip") } menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options)) for i, option := range options { // note to self. Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function innerOption := option menuItems[i] = &menuItem{ displayString: innerOption, onPress: func() error { return gui.genericMergeCommand(innerOption) }, } }
And voilà! The bug was fixed, and lazygit's questionable reputation as a reliable git GUI was preserved for another day.
Lesson learnt: Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function definition!
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Golang Gotcha of the Day》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
PHP经典实例(第3版)
David Sklar、Adam Trachtenberg / 苏金国、丁小峰 / 中国电力出版社 / 2015-7 / 128.00
想要掌握PHP编程技术?或者想要学习如何完成一个特定的任务?那么一定要先看看《PHP经典实例(第3版)》。本书介绍了专门为PHP 5.4和5.5修订的350个经典技巧,并提供了丰富的示例代码。特别是对生成动态Web内容的解决方案做了全面更新,从使用基本数据类型到查询数据库,从调用RESTful API到测试和保护网站安全都有涵盖。 各个技巧都提供了示例代码,可以免费使用,另外还讨论了如何解决......一起来看看 《PHP经典实例(第3版)》 这本书的介绍吧!