Golang Gotcha of the Day

栏目: IT技术 · 发布时间: 6年前

内容简介:This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was no

Golang Gotcha of the Day

This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was not aborting, but instead moved along a couple of commits and then got stuck at some more conflicts.

Were not all aborts created equal? Maybe sometimes in order to abort you need to go forward first, and git was hitting conflicts along the way? I wasn't quite ready to give up my understanding of how rebasing works, so I took a look at the code

func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
    options := []string{"continue", "abort"}

    if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
        options = append(options, "skip")
    }

    menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
    for i, option := range options {
        menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
            displayString: option,
            onPress: func() error {
                return gui.genericMergeCommand(option)
            },
        }
    }
    ...

Can you spot the bug?

The logic was simple: create a slice of strings representing the different options available, and then create menu items to show in the GUI, where if you pressed say 'abort', lazygit would run git rebase --abort .

I checked for an off-by-one error on the index: perhaps the menu items started counting from 1 instead of zero? Nope.

Turns out lazygit actually ran 'git rebase --skip', which explained why it would continue the rebase and then stop again. And then it struck me: skip was the last string in the slice. It just so happens that when a function inside a loop closes over a loop variable, it ends up referring to the final value of that variable, because on each iteration of the loop the loop variable's value is reassigned. In this case, the last value was the last item in the options slice, i.e. 'skip'.

So I added a variable which was scoped to the inside of the loop, to assign the value of the loop variable for that iteration. Unlike closures which work on references, direct assignments just take the value of the variable at the time of assignment, meaning its value wasn't going to change no matter what happened in future iterations.

func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
    options := []string{"continue", "abort"}

    if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
        options = append(options, "skip")
    }

    menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
    for i, option := range options {
        // note to self. Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function
        innerOption := option
        menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
            displayString: innerOption,
            onPress: func() error {
                return gui.genericMergeCommand(innerOption)
            },
        }
    }

And voilà! The bug was fixed, and lazygit's questionable reputation as a reliable git GUI was preserved for another day.

Lesson learnt: Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function definition!


以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Golang Gotcha of the Day》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!

查看所有标签

猜你喜欢:

本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们

互联网思想十讲

互联网思想十讲

段永朝 / 商务印书馆 / 2014-10 / 68.00

本书是作者为北京大学新闻与传播学院硕士生开设的《互联网前沿思想》课程的讲义。作者力图从技术、经济和社会的角度,在大尺度上观察互联网究竟根植于什么样的文化土壤。作者选择了复杂性、社会网络分析、公共空间这三个维度展开分析,为读者呈现出了脱胎于工业时代的互联网继承了哪些思想,并对哪些思想做出了彻底的颠覆。一起来看看 《互联网思想十讲》 这本书的介绍吧!

JS 压缩/解压工具
JS 压缩/解压工具

在线压缩/解压 JS 代码

RGB转16进制工具
RGB转16进制工具

RGB HEX 互转工具

RGB HSV 转换
RGB HSV 转换

RGB HSV 互转工具