内容简介:This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was no
This one has bitten me in the ass probably three times in the last month. The most recent bite occured just last night as I was debugging the rebase logic in lazygit. I had noticed that after selecting the 'abort' option in my rebase menu the rebase was not aborting, but instead moved along a couple of commits and then got stuck at some more conflicts.
Were not all aborts created equal? Maybe sometimes in order to abort you need to go forward first, and git was hitting conflicts along the way? I wasn't quite ready to give up my understanding of how rebasing works, so I took a look at the code
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
options := []string{"continue", "abort"}
if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
options = append(options, "skip")
}
menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
for i, option := range options {
menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
displayString: option,
onPress: func() error {
return gui.genericMergeCommand(option)
},
}
}
...
Can you spot the bug?
The logic was simple: create a slice of strings representing the different options available, and then create menu items to show in the GUI, where if you pressed say 'abort', lazygit would run git rebase --abort .
I checked for an off-by-one error on the index: perhaps the menu items started counting from 1 instead of zero? Nope.
Turns out lazygit actually ran 'git rebase --skip', which explained why it would continue the rebase and then stop again. And then it struck me: skip was the last string in the slice. It just so happens that when a function inside a loop closes over a loop variable, it ends up referring to the final value of that variable, because on each iteration of the loop the loop variable's value is reassigned. In this case, the last value was the last item in the options slice, i.e. 'skip'.
So I added a variable which was scoped to the inside of the loop, to assign the value of the loop variable for that iteration. Unlike closures which work on references, direct assignments just take the value of the variable at the time of assignment, meaning its value wasn't going to change no matter what happened in future iterations.
func (gui *Gui) handleCreateRebaseOptionsMenu(g *gocui.Gui, v *gocui.View) error {
options := []string{"continue", "abort"}
if gui.State.WorkingTreeState == "rebasing" {
options = append(options, "skip")
}
menuItems := make([]*menuItem, len(options))
for i, option := range options {
// note to self. Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function
innerOption := option
menuItems[i] = &menuItem{
displayString: innerOption,
onPress: func() error {
return gui.genericMergeCommand(innerOption)
},
}
}
And voilà! The bug was fixed, and lazygit's questionable reputation as a reliable git GUI was preserved for another day.
Lesson learnt: Never, EVER, close over loop variables in a function definition!
以上所述就是小编给大家介绍的《Golang Gotcha of the Day》,希望对大家有所帮助,如果大家有任何疑问请给我留言,小编会及时回复大家的。在此也非常感谢大家对 码农网 的支持!
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。
大数据时代的IT架构设计
IT架构设计研究组 / 电子工业出版社 / 2014-4 / 49.00元
《大数据时代的IT架构设计》以大数据时代为背景,邀请著名企业中的一线架构师,结合工作中的实际案例展开与架构相关的讨论。《大数据时代的IT架构设计》作者来自互联网、教育、传统行业等领域,分享的案例极其实用,代表了该领域较先进的架构。无论你就职于哪一行业都可以从本书中找到相关的架构经验,对您在今后的架构设计工作中都能起到很好的帮助作用。 《大数据时代的IT架构设计》适合具备一定架构基础和架构经验......一起来看看 《大数据时代的IT架构设计》 这本书的介绍吧!