内容简介:Every Tuesday I highlight an interesting paper that I came across in research or work. I hope that my review can help you get the juiciest part of the paper under 2 minutes!It is widely accepted that CNNs learn images by extracting shape features like curv
Food for Thought — Paper Tuesday
Use Shape-biased Data Improves Accuracy and Robustness
Every Tuesday I highlight an interesting paper that I came across in research or work. I hope that my review can help you get the juiciest part of the paper under 2 minutes!
Basic Ideas
It is widely accepted that CNNs learn images by extracting shape features like curves and edges. However, a group of researchers from University of Tuebingen and Edinburgh challenged this belief in their ICLR 2019 paper ImageNet-Trained CNNs Are Biased Towards Texture; Increasing Shape Bias Improves Accuracy and Robustness .
Here’s the link: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=Bygh9j09KX
By cleverly crafting several experiments, the researchers demonstrated CNNs are more biased toward image textures than people would expect. From that, they further found that shape-enhanced dataset can serve as an effective data augmentation method that improves model accuracy and robustness.
The researchers argued that CNNs are heavily biased toward local features, perhaps due to the small perception field of convolution filters. Their argument is supported by CNN’s surprisingly low performance on texture-free images demonstrated in the image below
As demonstrated in the figure, all major-league architectures like AlexNet, GoogleNet, and VGG16 experience significant performance drops when texture information is removed (silhouette and edge). Meanwhile, CNNs yield high confidence even when shape information is removed as long as texture is present (texture).
Results
In order to further test their hypothesis, the researchers generated a new dataset called Stylized-ImageNet (SIN), whose images’ local texture features are replaced by uninformative random features.
If CNNs are biased toward local texture features, we would expect CNNs trained on the original ImageNet dataset to perform poorly on SIN. This is indeed the case, as demonstrated in the following table
Okay, now we are convinced that CNNs are biased toward local textures. But how can we use this inforamtion to our advantage? The researchers demonstrated that models jointly trained on SIN and IN is more robust to image distortion (noise, cropping, filtering…) and achieve outstanding accuracies in image classification and object detection.
Some Thoughts
For a long time I was convinced that CNNs are capable of image classification because of its powerful edge detectors. This paper opened a new door for us — there are some many handwaving explaination and understanding of neural networks. There are still a lot of theoretical work ahead to understand even one of the simplest forms of neural networks!
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作能带来一定的帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。