SkySkimmer #1
Introduction
Presenting a custom version of Coq, extended with definitional UIP
(using the version at https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/10390 ) and
providing a brand new Lean Import
command.
It is available at https://github.com/SkySkimmer/coq/tree/lean-import
This is an experimental alpha, it is useful to compare how Lean and
Coq work but probably not much beyond that.
The Lean Import
command itself can be implemented as a plugin (and
will be once a few changes are upstreamed), but typechecking of Lean
terms requires UIP.
How do I install this?
Use your favorite installation procedure for Coq, using
https://github.com/SkySkimmer/coq/tree/lean-import for the source.
How do I use this?
You need Lean exported files
as input.
(I used Lean version 3.4.2, but this format looks pretty stable so other versions should work)
For your convenience, I have uploaded a few examples:
-
core.out
(256KB)
This corresponds to core.lean in Lean’s stdlib.
It contains 584 basic definitions and inductives such as equality, natural numbers, and the primitive quotient type (without the soundness axiom). -
stdlib.out
(14MB)
This is the whole Lean stdlib, totalling 10244 definitions and inductives. -
mathlib.7z
(211MB compressed to 36MB)
All mathlib (AFAICT): 66400 definitions and inductives (the way I counted may differ a bit from the way Lean counts).
Then start Coq and run
Require Lean. Lean Import "/path/to/stdlib.out".
(if using the mathlib.7z
I uploaded, make sure to decompress it first)
Coq will output many messages:
line 20: eq eq is predeclared line 21: quot quot registered line 38: has_add line 59: has_add.add line 90: add_semigroup line 125: add_semigroup.add line 136: add_semigroup.to_has_add line 145: has_zero line 159: has_zero.zero line 168: has_mul line 182: has_mul.mul line 210: semigroup line 243: semigroup.mul line 253: semigroup.to_has_mul line 262: has_one line 276: has_one.one line 285: has_le line 305: has_le.le line 323: list line 331: nat line 348: or ...
The Require Lean
is needed for primitive quotient support (and
because quotients talk about equalities it predeclares eq
). Without
it, you will get an error when trying to declare any value which
depends on quot
.
Once it has finished working, Coq will output a summary:
... line 586592: string.mk_iterator.equations._eqn_1 line 586615: heq.elim Done! - 10245 entries (24081 possible instances) (including quot). - 274 universe expressions - 14091 names - 562009 expression nodes Max universe instance length 4. 0 inductives have non syntactically arity types.
An “entry” means an axiom or constant, or an inductive type (including
its constructors and recursor), or the primitive quotient declarations
quot
, quot.mk
, quot.lift
and quot.ind
.
For ease of debugging, Lean Import
will succeed even when an error
occurs: this allows inspecting the state from just before the failing entry.
This may probably be changed to only happen in a debugging mode at some point.
How does it work?
The basic idea is to translate Lean Prop
to Coq SProp
, inductives
to inductives, etc.
We need to deal with a few issues in the translation:
Differences in name handling
Lean has .
separated namespaces, so we can have foo.c
depend on
bar.b
which depends on foo.a
. This cannot be done with Coq
modules. Instead we replace dots by underscores, and add some indexing
to deal with collisions.
For instance,
inductive nat | zero : nat | succ (n : nat) : nat
becomes
Inductive nat := nat_zero | nat_succ (n : nat).
then if Lean declared a nat_succ
it would get renamed to nat_succ0
.
Prop instantiations
Lean provides universe polymorphic values where universes may be
instantiated by Prop
. For instance
inductive psum (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) | inl {} (val : α) : psum | inr {} (val : β) : psum
provides discriminated sums of relevant as well as irrelevant types:
we can have psum@{0 0} true true
as well as psum@{1 1} nat bool
or
even psum@{0 1} true nat
.
In Coq this is not possible. Instead we duplicate every value
according to which universes are instantiated to Prop
. This
duplication is what the “possible instances” refers to in the end of
processing summary.
The version where no universe is Prop
is considered the default and
gets the base name. The others have _instX
appended to their name,
where X
is the decimal representation of the number where bit n
is
set if and only if universe n
is instantiated by Prop
. (this
naming scheme is subject to change)
By default, we produce the base instance, and the others are produced
as needed when encountered in other base instances. In other words,
when encountering the entry for psum
we declare
Inductive psum (α:Type) (β:Type) := psum_inl (val:α) | psum_inr (val:β).
Then if we later encounter def bla := ... psum@{0 u} ...
we will produce
Inductive psum_inst1 (α:Type) (β:Type) := psum_inl_inst1 (val:α) | psum_inr_inst1 (val:β).
and the same for psum_inst2
and psum_inst3
.
This lazyness has an exception: each instance of an inductive type
with large elimination has 2 instances of the recursor, depending on
whether we’re eliminating to a Prop
motive. These 2 instances are
always declared, so we don’t wait until psum_rec_inst1
is needed to
declare it.
Instances may be eagerly declared by using Set Lean Upfront Instantiation
.
Algebraic universes
Lean uses non cumulative universes, such that Π (x:A), B
lives
exactly in the impredicative maximum of the domain and codomain
universes: imax(uA,uB)
. We also get max
in the level of inductive
types.
Thanks to the previous section, every universe name can be determined
to be either SProp
or strictly greater than Set
, so we can reduce
universe expressions to Coq algebraic universes. However this leaves
us with 2 issues:
-
Coq expects universes in terms to be atomic, except in the codomain
of the type of a global declaration. This is mostly required for the
elaborator, so we could ignore it.
-
Coq universe polymorphic values may only be instantiated by atomic
universes (and, as we mentioned, ones which are not
SProp
).However Lean can (and must, due to lack of cumulativity) instantiate
polymorphic universes with arbitrary expressions.
So we need to replace algebraic universes in universe instances by
some atomic name. In order to preserve conversions, we also need to
replace algebraic universes in terms (so for instance if we have def univ@{u} := Sort u
, the translation of univ@{max(u,v)}
must be
convertible to Sort (max (u,v))
).
The full process of translating a universe expression is then:
-
first, produce a Coq algebraic universe:
-
Prop
is translated toSProp
-
a+1
is translated to the Coq successor of the translation ofa
(note that the successor ofSProp
isSet + 1
, notSProp + 1
which is invalid) -
a Lean universe parameter is translated to
SProp
or a Coq named
universe (depending on which instance we are currently producing) -
max(a,b)
is translated to the max of the respective translations -
imax(a,b)
is translated toSProp
ifb
is translated to
SProp
, otherwise to the max of the respective translations.
-
We also need to make sure that every universe parameter not
instantiated by Prop
is considered strictly greater than Set
. This
is because Lean recognizes that imax(Prop+1,l)+1 <= max(Prop+1,l+1)
:
either l=Prop
, in which case the problem reduces to Prop+1 <= Prop+1
, or l=l'+1
, in which case it reduces to l'+1 <= l'+2
.
However in our translation we reduced to max(Set+1,l)+1 <= max(Set+1,l+1)
which is only true when Set < l
.
To ensure this we keep constraints Set < l
for every universe
parameter l
, and we also apply a simplification step to the
translated universes which removes any Set+n
subexpression when it
is together with a l+k
with n <= k + 1
.
We then associate a unique surrogate name for each simplified
algebraic universe.
At the end, we will produce a top-level universe polymorphic value
with the original parameters appended with the surrogates. It will
have constraints such that Set < l
for each original parameter l
,
and each pair of parameter (surrogate or original) is related by any
constraint relating its corresponding algebraic universes. For
instance, if AB
is the surrogate for max(a,b)
and ABC
is the
surrogate for max(a,b,c)
we must have all of a <= AB, b <= AB, a <= ABC, b <= ABC, c <= ABC
and AB <= ABC
.
Since we have added universe parameters, we must adapt instances in
terms accordingly: if a definition foo@{u}
is translated to foo@{u, U1}
where U1
is the surrogate for max(Set+2,u)
, its use as
foo@{max(a,b)}
must be translated to foo@{AB AB2}
where AB
is the
surrogate for max(a,b)
and AB2
is the surrogate for
max(Set+2,a,b)
.
By default, surrogate names are based on their corresponding universe.
For instance the surrogate for max(u,v)
is Lean.max__u_v.0
. If a
strangely-crafted input uses this to cause collisions, you can Unset Lean Fancy Universes
to get guaranteed unique names bla.XXX
where
bla
is the current file and XXX
some unique index.
Note that once the kernel has accepted a declaration the universe
names are used only for printing.
Subsingletons
Even with Coq accepting UIP, the rules for which inductives enjoy
unrestricted eliminations are different between Coq and Lean.
Typically, the accessibility predicate Acc
is unrestricted in Lean
but is not accepted in SProp
by Coq.
This is because it leads to an undecidable theory (of course we now
know that UIP combined with impredicativity is enough for that).
The workaround is simple: we detect when Coq is stricter than Lean and
in that case disable universe checking while declaring the inductive.
Sadly this is not enough to make the translation work in Coq without
UIP, because such a Coq also lacks the special reduction of the
eliminator of equality.
Note that this translation breaks extraction: for instance the recursor
of the translated acc
cannot be extracted. However a more careful
translation could take advantage of Coq’s non recursively uniform
parameter feature to fix extraction.
We may note that Lean is sometimes stricter than Coq. Specifically, if
an inductive has a Prop
and a non- Prop
instantiation, it may
happen that Coq only squashes the Prop
instantiation.
Primitive quotients
Lean’s quotient primitives are
constant quot {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) : Sort u constant quot.mk {α : Sort u} (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : quot r constant quot.lift {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) : (∀ a b : α, r a b → eq (f a) (f b)) → quot r → β constant quot.ind {α : Sort u} {r : α → α → Prop} {β : quot r → Prop} : (∀ a : α, β (quot.mk r a)) → ∀ q : quot r, β q
with the appropriate reductions.
Coq can emulate this using “Private inductive types”. This emulation
has been done for you in the Coq module named Coq.Lean
: simply
Require
it before running Lean Import
.
Because the lift
mentions equality, Coq.Lean
also predeclares the
equality type (we can’t use the one from Coq’s standard library since
it’s not polymorphic). Declaring the eliminators for equality is still
done by Lean Import
.
Additional note on recursors
Coq autogenerates recursors for inductives types called (for an
inductivefoo
) foo_sind
, foo_ind
, foo_rec
and foo_rect
(respectively for SProp
, Prop
, Set
and Type
motives).
These names are automatically detected by tactics like induction
.
When the inductive is universe polymorphic (which is always the case
for our translations) the recursors are also universe polymorphic, and
notably the motive of the _rect
version is a universe parameter.
However we cannot directly reuse the generated _sind
and _rect
recursors as the 2 instantiations of the translated Lean recursor:
-
In Lean the motive universe is the first parameter, in Coq it is the
last. This is could be handled during the translation though.
-
Coq generates non dependent eliminators for
SProp
inductives, butif the original Lean inductive has a non-
Prop
instantiation Leanexpects a dependent eliminator.
-
Each recursive argument of each constructor corresponds to an
inductive hypothesis in the function for the branch of that
constructor (the first
P n
innat_rect : forall P : nat -> Type, P 0 -> (forall n : nat, P n -> P (S n)) -> forall n : nat, P n
). InCoq each inductive hypothesis comes immediately after the recursive
argument, but in Lean the inductive hypotheses come after all the
constructor argument.
This produces different types when a recursive argument is not the
last constructor argument, for instance with
Inductive bin_tree := Leaf | Node (a b : bin_tree).
Coq generates
bin_tree_rect : forall P : bin_tree -> Type, P Leaf -> (forall a : bin_tree, P a -> forall b : bin_tree, P b -> P (Node a b)) -> forall b : bin_tree, P b
but Lean expects
bin_tree_rect : forall P : bin_tree -> Type, P Leaf -> (forall a b : bin_tree, P a -> P b -> P (Node a b)) -> forall b : bin_tree, P b
To avoid these issues, we explicitly ask Coq for a term implementing
the recursor with the expected dependency, then post-process it to fix
universe and argument order. Since the result may not be compatible
with induction
's expectation, we use our own suffixes _indl
and
_recl
( l
for Lean
).
_indl
for the Prop
-motive recursor, any _inst
suffix corresponds to the instantiation of the inductive we eliminate.
For instance psum_inst3_indl
is instance 5 (all universes Prop
) of
psum.rec
, its principal argument is of type psum_inst3
.
Experimental results
All times are on my laptop, which may have caused variance through
thermal throttling or whatever.
The export for just core.lean
passes without issue in about 2s.
The whole stdlib cannot be checked as some conversion problems are
pathological. two_pos
seems a typical example ( 0 < 2
in an ordered
field). It’s interesting to note that on this specific example,
changing the default conversion procedure to use Coq’s VM makes it
succeeds in about 1 second (tested by importing with Unset Conversion Checking
(see next section), then Require Import
the resulting
.vo
and do Definition foo := Eval cbv [two_pos] in two_pos.
).
Sadly using the VM makes other declarations take too long, and anyway
it hasn’t been updated for proof irrelevance and for UIP’s special
reduction.
As a superset of the stdlib, mathlib also cannot be fully checked.
Worse, even with Unset Conversion Checking
it tries to use more RAM
and takes longer than I was willing to try.
Some stats:
-
stdlib:
lean --export in 46s, about 450MB RAM
leanchecker in 8s, 80MB RAM
Lean Import with Unset Conversion Checking: 43s, 723MB RAM
resulting vo size 53MB
Lean Import with 10s line timeout: 451s, 720MB RAM
resulting vo size 50MB
89 skipped entries out of 10244 (32 timeout, rest due to missing value from previous errors)
-
mathlib:
lean --export: didn’t measure, took long enough and enough RAM that I don’t want to retry
(at least 1h / 10GB RAM I guess)
leanchecker: 6min, 1GB RAM
Lean Import with Just Parsing: 347s, 745MB RAM
Lean Import with Unset Conversion Checking: killed at 4GB RAM on filter_mem_inf_sets_of_right
Lean Import with Unset Conversion Checking and 10s timeout: 1h13min, 10GB RAM
resulting vo size 1.4GB
11867 skipped entries out of 66400 (first one is real.linear_order._proof_5)
Options
Conversion Checking
On by default. This is a new kernel option, only available in this Coq
variant.
With it off, the kernel will skip conversion checks. This is useful to
get past declarations where Coq’s heuristics don’t work without
breaking their dependents.
Lean Fancy Universes
See explanation of surrogate universe names.
Lean Upfront Instantiation
See explanation of universe polymorphism and Prop
.
Lean Skip Missing Quotient
On by default, this means that encountering the primitive quotient
entry when the primitive quotient has not been predeclared is not an
error (i.e. when Coq.Lean
is not loaded).
This means you will instead get a quot was not instantiated
error
when a declaration refers to it.
Lean Just Parsing
Off by default, if on Lean Import
will not actually translate
anything. Useful to get the summary of how many entries are
encountered quickly.
Lean Print Squash Info
Lean Import
misdetects whether Lean would allow unrestricted elimination for some
inductive type.
Lean Skip Errors
Off by default. With it on, when an error is encountered, skip the
failed line and keep going.
Useful to tell how much the current system can handle.
Note that timeouts and interrupts are also absorbed by this option. If
you turn it on and start loading mathlib, then change your mind and
decide to stop, you will need to kill the Coq process.
Lean Line Timeout
An integer option, off by default. Use Set Lean Line Timeout 10.
to
cause a failure whenever some entry takes more than 10s. Combined with
Lean Skip Errors
, this allows processing all the entries which do
not depend on something that takes more than 10s.
9 Likes
spitters #2
Very cool. This really helps understanding the differences.
Why is this disallowed in Coq? What would break if we added it?
How often is this feature used in lean? As you point out it has quite negative consequences.
Any thoughts on what happens here with native_compute or certicoq?
SkySkimmer #3
Prop instantiations
In Coq instantiating with either Prop or SProp is forbidden (for the translation we only care about SProp and never touch Prop)
AFAICT instantiating with Prop is mostly a matter of changing stuff so that we do typechecking without ambient Set <= u
constraints by default. It wouldn’t be complete (ie Definition product
would land in the max
universe since we don’t have imax, and imax seems harder to do when you have to generate cumulativity constraints and refresh universes) but I guess that’s OK.
For SProp it’s harder, because if the definition requires a constraint u < v
we don’t know if the implicit u <= v
was used (in which case we can’t instantiate u
by SProp).
subsingletons
How often is this feature used in lean? As you point out it has quite negative consequences.
Not sure tbh
Any thoughts on what happens here with native_compute or certicoq?
What do you mean?
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望对大家的学习有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持 码农网
猜你喜欢:本站部分资源来源于网络,本站转载出于传递更多信息之目的,版权归原作者或者来源机构所有,如转载稿涉及版权问题,请联系我们。